2014
DOI: 10.4103/1012-5574.133174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of conventional temporal bone computed tomography in the management of cholesteatoma otitis media: Report of 96 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Majority of false negatives (4 cases) were seen in tubotympanic type. Hence HRCT had less sensitivity of 76% but high specificity of 86.6% in detecting the ossicular erosion and these findings are in concurrence with earlier study 16 . HRCT has shown a less sensitivity 72.3 % but high specificity 83.3% in the detection of stapes erosion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Majority of false negatives (4 cases) were seen in tubotympanic type. Hence HRCT had less sensitivity of 76% but high specificity of 86.6% in detecting the ossicular erosion and these findings are in concurrence with earlier study 16 . HRCT has shown a less sensitivity 72.3 % but high specificity 83.3% in the detection of stapes erosion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All 12 cases detected tegmen erosion on HRCT showing high sensitivity and specificity of 100%. These findings are in concurrence with other studies 24. However, in Mardassi Ali et al 16 study had poor sensitivity of 60% and were mostly seen in pars tensacholesteatoma unlike 70% sensitivity reported in Prabhu et al 2 study. Studies 17 quoted that tegmen and dural plate erosion helps to decide surgical approach based on tympanic membrane and compartment involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, there are concerns that HRCT lacks guaranteed sensitivity and specificity for the determination of FCD. In the literature, the sensitivity rates of HRCT for the FCD range from 0 to 100% while the reported specificity rates for FCD are considerably higher [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Tatlipinar et al determined that the thin bone covering the FN was occasionally difficult to evaluate owing to partial volume averaging with adjacent soft tissue; thus, the authors were able to detect 35 of 39 (89.7%) FCD using HRCT with a negative predictive value of 89.7% [17].…”
Section: Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the surgeon has good knowledge of temporal bone anatomy and its relationship with the adjacent structures mentioned above, s/he can decide on the type of surgery (i.e., open or closed technique) and inform the patient about possible complications. However, the sensitivity of HRCT is low in the detection of preoperative FCD; thus, some authors have suggested that routine preoperative HRCT examination prior to uncomplicated COM surgery was of questionable value [14,17,20,21]. Therefore, in addition to having good knowledge of anatomy, the surgeon must also consider the conditions in which the FCD rates may be high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRCT accurately predicted LSCC fistula with excellent sensitivity and good specificity. Mardassi Ali 23 also states that LSCC is the most common semicircular canal to be eroded in cholesteatoma because of its close proximity to the medial wall of attic anatomically. Similar incidence also noted by Chuni Lal Thukral et al 3 who reported sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 97.73% 26 , and Rocher et al 20 reported HRCT to be 100% sensitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%