Coastal Sediments '07 2007
DOI: 10.1061/40926(239)154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of Beach and Dune Erosion in Response to Wave Runup Elucidated from SUPERTANK

Abstract: Abstract:The unique dataset from SUPERTANK is analyzed to examine the upper limit of beach change in response to elevated water level caused by wave runup. Thirty SUPERTANK runs are investigated, including both erosional and accretionary wave conditions under random and monochromatic waves. The upper limit of beach change approximately equals the maximum vertical excursion of swash runup. Exceptions to this direct relationship are those with beach or dune scarps. The vertical extent of wave runup above mean wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The profile has a submerged length (l s ) of 6 m that develops towards a total depth of 0.4 m (defined through Roberts' [26] formulation 27), which corresponds to the closure depth (d c ) and the adopted maximum offshore depth, giving the profile a total height (h t ) of 52 cm (Figure 1), with a slope (β) of 0.03. The total cross-shore extension of the beach was of 10 m.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The profile has a submerged length (l s ) of 6 m that develops towards a total depth of 0.4 m (defined through Roberts' [26] formulation 27), which corresponds to the closure depth (d c ) and the adopted maximum offshore depth, giving the profile a total height (h t ) of 52 cm (Figure 1), with a slope (β) of 0.03. The total cross-shore extension of the beach was of 10 m.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profile has a submerged length (ls) of 6 m that develops towards a total depth of 0.4 m (defined through Roberts' [26] formulation 27), which corresponds to the closure depth (dc) and the adopted maximum offshore depth, giving the profile a total height (ht) of 52 cm (Figure 1), with a slope (β) of 0.03. The total cross-shore extension of the beach was of 10 m. The modeled beach was built over a dissipative beach to reduce the amount of sediment necessary for the model and to dissipate the wave energy propagating and breaking over the model landward limit (Figure 2).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a series of large-scale laboratory experiments at SUPERTANK (Kraus and Smith, 1994) and Large-scale Sediment Transport Facility (LSTF) (Wang et al, 2002a(Wang et al, , 2002b, Roberts et al (2010) developed a simple empirical formula linking maximum wave runup (R tw ) to significant breaking wave height (H bs ) as…”
Section: The Sallenger Impact Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal axis ''distance'' refers to the SUPERTANK coordinate system and is not directly related to morphological features. and Kraus (2007). The first SUPERTANK wave run, ST10A, was conducted with a monotonic initial profile (Equation 8).…”
Section: Beach-profile Changementioning
confidence: 99%