2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps201211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited wind-driven dispersal of intertidal mussel larvae: in situ evidence from the plankton and the spread of the invasive species Mytilus galloprovincialis in South Africa

Abstract: Dispersal of intertidal mussel propagules was examined by sampling larvae (0.2 to 0.8 mm) of Perna perna in shallow (10 to 20 m) inshore waters on the south coast of South Africa. Mussels were randomly distributed through the water column with no signs of diel vertical migration. Horizontal distribution was sampled on fine scale grids of plankton stations on 5 occasions. Lines of stations ran offshore and were 300 m apart. Within each line, stations were 10 m apart. On each occasion grids were sampled 3 to 4 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
145
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
12
145
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This would intuitively suggest that the larvae have the ability to disperse over large distances and colonize areas far away from their maternal colonies. However, there have been studies indicating recruitment to be both localized on a scale of metres to occurring at large distances on a scale of kilometres away from maternal populations (Booth and Brosnan 1995;McQuaid and Phillips 2000;Pineda et al 2010). This investigation revealed a clearly higher species number and abundance within established assemblages at site U in comparison to site W. This leads to a similar pattern among new recruits, with higher numbers of species and individuals at site U.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This would intuitively suggest that the larvae have the ability to disperse over large distances and colonize areas far away from their maternal colonies. However, there have been studies indicating recruitment to be both localized on a scale of metres to occurring at large distances on a scale of kilometres away from maternal populations (Booth and Brosnan 1995;McQuaid and Phillips 2000;Pineda et al 2010). This investigation revealed a clearly higher species number and abundance within established assemblages at site U in comparison to site W. This leads to a similar pattern among new recruits, with higher numbers of species and individuals at site U.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, the localized effects of predation may 13 be less influential in the regulation of communities (Palmer et al, 1996). Recent studies suggest, 14 however, that the scales of larval transport and dispersal of many coastal species may be smaller 15 than originally thought (McQuaid and Phillips, 2000;Pineda et al, 2007 for discussion and 16 references), suggesting that predation of local larvae may have a role in the dynamics of 17…”
Section: Larval Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supply of planktonic larvae in a particular region depends on the proximity of larvae sources and hydrodynamic transport toward the region (Levin 2006) and, to a certain extent, also on larval swimming behavior (Knights and others 2006). As the swimming capacity of larvae is limited relative to water currents, the spatial connectivity of the mussel populations, and therefore the degree of population synchrony, will largely depend on regional geomorphology and currents during the larval stage (Young and others 1996;McQuaid and Phillips 2000;Gilg and Hilbish 2003;Watson and others 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%