2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps199271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited effects of a keystone species:trends of sea otters and kelp forests at the Semichi Islands, Alaska

Abstract: Sea otters are well known as a keystone species because of their ability to transform sea urchin-dominated communities into kelp-dominated communities by preying on sea urchins and thus reducing the intensity of herbivory. After being locally extinct for more than a century, sea otters re-colonized the Sernichi Islands in the Aleutian Archipelago, Alaska in the early 1990s. Here, otter populations increased to about 400 individuals by 1994, but rapidly declined to about 100 by 1997. Roughly 7 yr after initial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An approximate 90% reduction in sea otters in the western Aleutian Islands was followed by a 9-fold increase in sea urchin Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus biomass and a nearly 90% reduction in kelp (Estes et al 1998). In contrast, in both the Knight Island area of Prince William Sound (our study) and the Semichi Islands (Konar 2000), a reduction in sea otter abundance on the order of 50% resulted in no apparent effect on sea urchin biomass, and little or no change in kelp abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An approximate 90% reduction in sea otters in the western Aleutian Islands was followed by a 9-fold increase in sea urchin Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus biomass and a nearly 90% reduction in kelp (Estes et al 1998). In contrast, in both the Knight Island area of Prince William Sound (our study) and the Semichi Islands (Konar 2000), a reduction in sea otter abundance on the order of 50% resulted in no apparent effect on sea urchin biomass, and little or no change in kelp abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…In some cases, sea urchin densities have dramatically declined and kelp abundance has increased within a few months of sea otter reoccupation (Laur et al 1988, Watson 1993. However, little response was observed in the 10 yr following reoccupation by sea otters in the Sernichi Islands, Alaska (Konar 2000). An approximate 90% reduction in sea otters in the western Aleutian Islands was followed by a 9-fold increase in sea urchin Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus biomass and a nearly 90% reduction in kelp (Estes et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A problem with such definitions is that species shown to have the potential for strong effects (sensu Paine; ref. 1) do not always impart such effects because of variability in their density (5,19), and species considered weak interactors might impart stronger than expected ecological effects in cases of high density (11). Furthermore, theoretical work suggests that the removal of a supposedly weak interactor can sometimes drive other species to extinction (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous nearshore dive studies have been conducted at other locations in the Aleutians, primarily focusing on the flora and fauna of hard substrates (Estes et al, 1989(Estes et al, , 2004Vicknair, 1997;Konar, 2000;Reisewitz et al, 2006). The recent decline of sea otters (Enhydra lutris) throughout the Aleutian archipelago has caused a shift in the rocky nearshore community, from one dominated by kelps to one dominated by sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus) (Estes et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%