2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited-Damage A*: A path search algorithm that considers damage as a feasibility criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayili and Polat [15] introduced a multiobjective path planning (MOPP) algorithm, Limited damage A*, considering damage as a feasibility criterion in addition to distance. When an agent navigates in a threat zone, it is exposed to an additive damage.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bayili and Polat [15] introduced a multiobjective path planning (MOPP) algorithm, Limited damage A*, considering damage as a feasibility criterion in addition to distance. When an agent navigates in a threat zone, it is exposed to an additive damage.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After planning, consider that agent has found three paths with costs (15,260), (18,230), and (23,200). If there are more than one nondominated paths, one of them is selected randomly.…”
Section: B Partially Observable Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using two hours per position, we tested IDA ⁄ and three different versions of SP-MCTS, subsequently called SP-MCTS (1), SP-MCTS (2), and SP-MCTS (3), on the standardized test set. IDA ⁄ applies the evaluation function described in Section 3.…”
Section: Comparison On the Standardized Test Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The selection strategy can be enhanced with RAVE [21] or progressive widening [13,17]. (2) This article demonstrated that combining small searches can achieve better scores than one large search. However, there is no information shared between the searches.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation