2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of dual and complementary inorganic–organic electrochromic device for smart window application and its colorimetric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when compared with other EC materials, poly [1] in LiClO4/PC showed faster responses (lower switching times) than the inorganic metal oxides (typically, τ = 12-60 s), 37,42 and similar or even higher optical contrasts and colouration efficiencies than some conducting polymers and derived composites.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, when compared with other EC materials, poly [1] in LiClO4/PC showed faster responses (lower switching times) than the inorganic metal oxides (typically, τ = 12-60 s), 37,42 and similar or even higher optical contrasts and colouration efficiencies than some conducting polymers and derived composites.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because the realization of a multicolor switch is preferred in the majority of their applications in displays, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] various electrochromic materials including polymers, 11,12 small organic molecules 13,14 and metal-organic complexes, 15 and technologies aimed at multicolor switches have been intensively explored. Transition metals based on metal-organic complex multicolor electrochromic materials exhibit attractive properties, such as high stability and chemiluminescence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For various aspects and information on electrochromic materials and windows it is referred to the available literature, e.g. the studies by Alamri (2009), Azens et al (2005), Baetens et al (2010a), Bhadra et al (2009), Bouessay et al (2002), Carpenter et al (1987), Carpenter and Conell (1990), K. -C. Chen et al (2011), Z. , Fantini and Gorenstein (1987), Geniès et al (1990), Granqvist (1989Granqvist ( , 1991Granqvist ( , 1995Granqvist ( , 2000Granqvist ( , 2005Granqvist ( , 2008Granqvist ( , 2012, Granqvist et al (1997Granqvist et al ( , 2003Granqvist et al ( , 2010, Green et al (2012ab), Jelle et al (1992ab, 1993abc, 2007, Hagen (1993, 1999ab), Kalagi et al (2011), Karuppasamy and Subrahmanyam (2007), Lampert (1980Lampert ( , 1984Lampert ( , 1986Lampert ( , 1989Lampert ( , 1998Lampert ( , 2004, Lampert and Ma (1992), Lampert et al (1999), Lee and DiBartolomeo (2002), Lee et al (2006ab), Leventis and Chung (1990), Makimura et al (2006), Monk et al (1995Monk et al ( , 2001, Mortimer (1999), …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%