Lignocellulosic biomass feedstock transportation alternatives, logistics, equipment configurations, and modeling

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass feedstock transportation bridges biomass production, transformation, and conversion into a complete bioenergy system. Transportation and associated logistics account for a major portion of the total feedstock supply cost and energy consumption, and therefore improvements in transportation can substantially improve the cost‐competitiveness of the bioenergy sector as a whole. The biomass form, intended end use, supply and demand locations, and equipment and facility availability further affect the performance of the transportation system. The sustainability of the delivery system thus requires optimized logistic chains, cost‐effective transportation alternatives, standardized facility design and equipment configurations, efficient regulations, and environmental impact analysis. These issues have been studied rigorously in the last decade. It is therefore prudent to comprehensively review the existing literature, which can then support systematic design of a feedstock transportation system. The paper reviews the major transportation alternatives and logistics and the implementation of those for various types of energy crops such as energy grasses, short‐rotation woody coppices, and agricultural residue. It emphasizes the importance of performance‐based equipment configuration, standard regulations, and rules for calculating transport cost of delivery systems. Finally, the principles, approaches, and further direction of lignocellulosic feedstock transportation modeling are reviewed and analyzed. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Modelling the socio-economic impacts of modern bioenergy in rural communities in Ghana

“…Of critical importance is the appropriate targeting of the subsidy scheme, ensuring that it ends up at intended destinations. In most bioenergy projects, feedstock costs form the major cost component (Miao et al, 2012). In the base scenario, it is assumed that feedstocks are obtained at no cost, making transportation the major cost component.…”

Process and Energy Analysis of Pelleting Agricultural and Woody Biomass Blends

“…The share of renewable energy from biomass feedstock resources will be significant in the future energy mix [3][4][5]. Traditionally, the biomass-based fuel industry has been dependent on forestry biomass.…”

“…Despite the fact that biomass from the agricultural sector has the potential to increase the overall biomass amount, the quality of agricultural biomass-derived pellets is low in terms of physical and chemical properties [6,7]. In general, the collection and preprocessing of biomass have been regarded key factors for efficient, profitable, and sustainable bioenergy production [3,6,8]. Low energy density, particularly that of agricultural biomass [9], makes the cost of feedstock logistics high.…”

Economics, Environmental Impacts, and Supply Chain Analysis of Cellulosic Biomass for Biofuels in the Southern US: Pine, Eucalyptus, Unmanaged Hardwoods, Forest Residues, Switchgrass, and Sweet Sorghum

“…Transportation emissions were dependent on biomass productivity (tonnes biomass produced per hectare per year), biomass moisture content, transportation distance, feedstock production level (500,000 bone dry tons or 453,592 metric tonnes), truck capacity (truck volume limitations occur in the switchgrass scenario), and covered area (Srinivasa et al 2009;Sokhansanj and Hess 2009;Banerjee et al 2010;Inman et al 2010;Miao et al 2011;Perlack and Stokes 2011;Gonzalez et al 2011a;Miao et al 2012). Pine, eucalyptus, and switchgrass had lower transportation GHG emissions, while forest residues, unmanaged hardwoods, and sweet sorghum had higher transportation GHG emissions (Fig.…”