2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68456-7_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightweight Spoken Utterance Classification with CFG, tf-idf and Dynamic Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted, the fuzzy matching method is much more accurate than the strict grammar-based method; the experiments in [8] show relative reductions in 1-best semantic error rate by 35% and 2-best semantic error rate by 45% on realistic unseen speech data. This is unsurprising, given that commercial large-vocabulary recognisers, with a little domain tuning, can achieve word error rates of under 15% on BabelDr data, while the grammar-based recogniser's WER is typically in the neighbourhood of 30-40%.…”
Section: The Babeldr Medical Phraselatormentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As noted, the fuzzy matching method is much more accurate than the strict grammar-based method; the experiments in [8] show relative reductions in 1-best semantic error rate by 35% and 2-best semantic error rate by 45% on realistic unseen speech data. This is unsurprising, given that commercial large-vocabulary recognisers, with a little domain tuning, can achieve word error rates of under 15% on BabelDr data, while the grammar-based recogniser's WER is typically in the neighbourhood of 30-40%.…”
Section: The Babeldr Medical Phraselatormentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The point is that the grammar-based recogniser's WER is much lower on the high-confidence portion of the data, and with a suitable threshold can be reduced to a point substantially under that of the large-vocabulary recogniser. The experiments in [8] show the hybrid method achieving a relative reduction in 1-best semantic error rate by 8% and 2-best semantic error rate by 20%, compared to the plain fuzzy matching method.…”
Section: Hybrid Processing and Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experiments, the keyword number increases from 10 to 50. Each keyword follows TF-IDFweight [9]. k value (ie the number of results returned to the subscriber) increases from 2 to 10.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each keyword t i is associated with a weight w(t i ). w(t i ) is TF-IDF[9] weight of keyword t i in s. (2) s G denotes s's geography description which is composed of latitude and longitude. (3) δ is a preference parameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%