1990
DOI: 10.1109/61.53068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning-induced voltages on multiconductor overhead lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I gives the peak values for the total currents and corresponding charges of three return strokes and three Initial-Stage (IS) currents and compares them with the peak values of the currents and charges entering the line through the pole 15 line ground. The charge transfer was obtained by numerically integrating the measured return stroke currents and the IS currents over a 1 ms time interval and a 10-ms time interval, respectively 1 . Table I shows that the percentage of the return stroke current peaks entering the line through the pole 15 line ground is significantly smaller than the percentage of the IS current peaks entering the line (return stroke events: 7%, initial stage events: between 12% and 17%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table I gives the peak values for the total currents and corresponding charges of three return strokes and three Initial-Stage (IS) currents and compares them with the peak values of the currents and charges entering the line through the pole 15 line ground. The charge transfer was obtained by numerically integrating the measured return stroke currents and the IS currents over a 1 ms time interval and a 10-ms time interval, respectively 1 . Table I shows that the percentage of the return stroke current peaks entering the line through the pole 15 line ground is significantly smaller than the percentage of the IS current peaks entering the line (return stroke events: 7%, initial stage events: between 12% and 17%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the time of operation of these arresters depends on their proximity to the lightning; the pole 10 arrester operates first, and the pole 6 and pole 2 arresters operate 0.8 s and 1.5 s, respectively, after the pole 10 arrester operates. Currently available models for calculating currents and voltages on power lines due to nearby lightning strikes (e.g., [1]- [5]) do not explain the experimental result that the closest arrester at pole 14 does not conduct negative current. In fact, preliminary modeling results show not only negative current in all arresters but also negative current in the closest arrester at pole 14 to be over four times larger than the current in the pole 2 arrester (the arrester furthest away from the lightning).…”
Section: Observed Effect Of Injected Currents On Arrester Currentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They have in fact different characteristics and thus it is necessary to verify the most dangerous to grounding system dimensioning Assuming that the step voltage is Us, ( t ) = us& (t) (8) and that the maximum step voltage V,, is a fraction K of the total ground voltage V,, according to the experimental results, it results in To design the ground system, the energies evaluated with Equations (16) and (17) values of the impulse impedance of the ground system to keep the step voltage within safety limits are shown in Table 2, for R, = 500 R and R, = 3000 0. Computations were carried out for negative lightning flashes only since it is more critical for the design.…”
Section: Limit Value Of Impulse Impedancementioning
confidence: 99%