2009
DOI: 10.1038/news.2009.1050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lighter sentence for murderer with 'bad genes'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also possibly becoming relevant to legal systems in some Western countries as DNA analysis has been rarely used as evidence in criminal trials, 16 but may increase in its use in the next few years. Therefore, we systematically reviewed genetic association studies of aggression and subjected all polymorphisms studied in more than three independent samples to meta-analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also possibly becoming relevant to legal systems in some Western countries as DNA analysis has been rarely used as evidence in criminal trials, 16 but may increase in its use in the next few years. Therefore, we systematically reviewed genetic association studies of aggression and subjected all polymorphisms studied in more than three independent samples to meta-analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have termed it the 'fundamental psycholegal error' [8]. In the few legal cases in which genetic information has been used to mitigate responsibility, this error has been common [9,10].…”
Section: Tics-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By 1995, a convicted murderer sought unsuccessfully to have his death sentence overturned on the basis that the trial court had refused to authorize payment for a test of his MAOA allele ( Mobley v. State , 1995). Soon some forensic evaluators began to obtain MAOA data routinely in serious criminal cases (Bernet, Vnencak-Jones, Farahany, & Montgomery, 2007), and reports appeared of sentence reductions on the basis of genetic evidence in Italy (Feresin, 2009; Greely, 2011) and the U.S. (Denno, 2011). A lively debate continues in the legal and philosophical literatures on the relevance of genetic data to claims for exculpation and mitigation, centered on whether the genetic findings are closely enough linked to excusing or mitigating conditions traditionally recognized by the law (Baum, 2011; Farahany, 2009; Morse, 2011; Slobogin, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%