2004
DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.3.373.50396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Pen Use and Practice Minimize Age and Hand Performance Differences in Pointing Tasks

Abstract: We contrasted performance with mouse and light pen input devices for younger, middle-aged, and older adults (N = 72) who were experienced mouse users. Participants used both preferred and nonpreferred hands to perform a menu target selection task. The light pen minimized age differences in performance relative to the mouse. Older adults were more lateralized on a handedness test than young adults and were less efficient using their nonpreferred hand. With practice, older adults improved their response time mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once selected, that candidate's name was highlighted and the vote was cast only when the voter touched "Accept Vote" at the bottom of the screen. Past research indicates that the use of a direct positioning device minimizes differences across age with regard to pure pointing tasks, which in turn reduces time and increases accuracy for attaining a target item (Charness, Holley, Feddon, & Jastrzembski, 2004). As such, we hypothesized that age differences would be minimized using the pure touchscreen system.…”
Section: This Problem Could Have Been Avoided If Voters Had Been Givementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once selected, that candidate's name was highlighted and the vote was cast only when the voter touched "Accept Vote" at the bottom of the screen. Past research indicates that the use of a direct positioning device minimizes differences across age with regard to pure pointing tasks, which in turn reduces time and increases accuracy for attaining a target item (Charness, Holley, Feddon, & Jastrzembski, 2004). As such, we hypothesized that age differences would be minimized using the pure touchscreen system.…”
Section: This Problem Could Have Been Avoided If Voters Had Been Givementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of comparative study on the using portable computer"s two cursor control devices -touchpad and trackpoint to carry out pointing and dragging tasks indicate that age effect significantly affects ergonomics, middle-aged people (40-65 years old) take significantly longer time to complete the task than younger people [9]. When using two different input devices--mouse and stylus to select menu, Charness et al found that using stylus can reduce the impact of age difference on ergonomics, the results indicate that it is more suitable for elderly people to use stylus to pointing task [10]. In addition, some researchers consider that when carrying out long-time frequent repetitive operations, it is more suitable for elderly people to use track ball than mouse [11].…”
Section: Current Situation Of Domestic and Foreign Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we assess whether they might even benefit from intuitive gesture input compared to traditional input modes such as function buttons and little joysticks which are typically used in mobile devices. The benefit for older users of direct input devices in general [3], and touch screens in particular [4], over indirect input devices such as the mouse, has already been demonstrated. However, there are also disadvantages related to touch screens, such as the lack of inherent feedback, the risk of inadvertent activation or difficulties with precision [5].…”
Section: Suitable Gestures For Older Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%