<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Quantifying the relative importance of gas uptake on the ground and aerosol surfaces helps to determine which processes should be included in atmospheric chemistry models. Gas uptake by aerosols is often characterized by an effective uptake coefficient (<i>&#947;</i><sub>eff</sub>), whereas gas uptake on the ground is usually described by a deposition velocity (<i>V</i><sub>d</sub>). For efficient comparison, we introduce an equivalent uptake coefficient (<i>&#947;</i><sub>eqv</sub>) at which the uptake flux of aerosols would equal that on the ground surface. If <i>&#947;</i><sub>eff</sub> is similar to or larger than <i>&#947;</i><sub>eqv</sub>, aerosol uptake is important and should be included in atmospheric models. In this study, we compare uptake fluxes in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) for different reactive trace gases (O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), aerosol types (mineral dust, soot, organic aerosol, sea salt aerosol), environments (urban, agricultural land, Amazon forest, water body), seasons, and mixing heights.</p> <p>For all investigated gases, <i>&#947;</i><sub>eqv</sub> ranges from 10<sup>&#8722;6</sup>&#8201;~&#8201;10<sup>&#8722;4</sup> in polluted urban environments to 10<sup>&#8722;4</sup>&#8201;~&#8201;10<sup>&#8722;1</sup> under pristine forest conditions. In urban areas, aerosol uptake is relevant for all species (<i>&#947;</i><sub>eff</sub>&#8201;&#8805;&#8201;<i>&#947;</i><sub>eqv</sub>) and should be considered in models. On the contrary, contributions of aerosol uptakes in Amazon forest are minor compared to the dry deposition. Phase state of aerosols could be one of the crucial factors influencing the uptake rates. Current models tend to underestimate the O<sub>3</sub> uptake on liquid organic aerosols which can be important especially over regions with <i>&#947;</i><sub>eff</sub>&#8201;&#8805;&#8201;<i>&#947;</i><sub>eqv</sub>. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> uptakes on a variety of aerosols is yet to be measured at laboratory and evaluated.</p> <p>Given the fact that most models have considered their uptakes on the ground surface, we suggest also considering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake by all types of aerosols, HNO<sub>3</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> uptakes by mineral dust, O<sub>3</sub> uptake by liquid organic aerosols and NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub> uptakes by sea salt aerosols in atmospheric models.</p>