2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand specificity, privileged substructures and protein druggability from fragment-based screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…71,72,73,74 It was also found that less polar fragments tend to bind with lower affinity and more promiscuously. 29,56,75 It seems that the presence of a strong hydrogen bond in the initial fragment indicates that a strong anchor point is likely to be maintained. 64 If the fragment does shift, it likely had multiple orientations in the first place, possibly disguised in poorly defined electron density.…”
Section: Size and Shape Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…71,72,73,74 It was also found that less polar fragments tend to bind with lower affinity and more promiscuously. 29,56,75 It seems that the presence of a strong hydrogen bond in the initial fragment indicates that a strong anchor point is likely to be maintained. 64 If the fragment does shift, it likely had multiple orientations in the first place, possibly disguised in poorly defined electron density.…”
Section: Size and Shape Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75,89,91 Some targets, such as many enzymes, have a well-defined pocket that has evolved to bind small molecules, so it is not surprising that many fragments bind in these substrate binding sites, often making some of the same interactions as the natural substrates. For example, screens against kinases often yield fragments that bind in the adenosine binding site, and these often have high ligand efficiency values.…”
Section: Target Related Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les fragments qui apparaissent comme touches dans les expériences de criblage sont ensuite validés un par un par différentes approches RMN (Figure 4). La RMN présente aussi l'avantage d'être une méthode structurale, ce qui nous permet non seulement de cribler les fragments, mais aussi d'intervenir dans la sélection des fragments touches, dans leur optimisation et leur évolution en molécules « tête de série », en s'aidant de données structurales concernant le complexe protéine-fragment [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Conception Rationnelle Assistée Par La Résolution Des Structunclassified
“…The approval of the B‐Raf kinase inhibitor vemurafenib (Zelboraf) in 20112 and the Bcl‐2 inhibitor venetoclax (Venclexta) in 2016,3 coupled with the ongoing evaluation of over 20 candidates in clinical trials,4 validates this approach as a complementary strategy to other hit‐discovery techniques such as high‐throughput screening 5. While the growing prevalence of fragment‐based approaches is encouraging, evaluation of many existing fragment libraries shows a predominance of (hetero)aromatic, “flat” compounds, with a deficiency of chiral, sp 3 ‐rich examples 6, 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%