1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00171050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand binding profile of the rat metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR3 expressed in a transfected cell line

Abstract: A cDNA clone encoding the rat metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR3 was stably transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Receptor-expressing cell lines were characterized by centrifugation binding assays using [3H]glutamate as radioligand. The rank order of affinity was L-glutamate > (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (1S,3R-ACPD) > L(+)-2-amino-3-phosphonopropionic acid (L-AP3) > quisqualic acid > L(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (L-AP4) > ibotenic acid. The active enantiomers of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, binding was inhibited by GTP γ S, confirming that, in mGlu 2 receptor‐transfected CHO cells, [ 3 H]‐DCG IV binding is to the G‐protein‐coupled mGlu 2 receptor. In contrast, Laurie et al (1995) failed to obtained an effect of GTP γ S on [ 3 H]‐glutamate binding to membranes from mGlu 3 receptor‐transfected HEK cells, the lack of effect of GTP γ S possibly being due to the non‐selectivity of [ 3 H]‐glutamate binding. As the inhibition evoked by GTP γ S in our study was incomplete, further experiments are necessary in order to determine if GTP γ S causes a shift in affinity of [ 3 H]‐DCG IV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, binding was inhibited by GTP γ S, confirming that, in mGlu 2 receptor‐transfected CHO cells, [ 3 H]‐DCG IV binding is to the G‐protein‐coupled mGlu 2 receptor. In contrast, Laurie et al (1995) failed to obtained an effect of GTP γ S on [ 3 H]‐glutamate binding to membranes from mGlu 3 receptor‐transfected HEK cells, the lack of effect of GTP γ S possibly being due to the non‐selectivity of [ 3 H]‐glutamate binding. As the inhibition evoked by GTP γ S in our study was incomplete, further experiments are necessary in order to determine if GTP γ S causes a shift in affinity of [ 3 H]‐DCG IV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In recent years, a number of groups have used [ 3 H]‐glutamate to study the radioligand binding properties of group II mGlu receptors in a variety of preparations. For example, Laurie et al (1995) characterized the binding of [ 3 H]‐glutamate to membranes of mGlu 3 receptor‐transfected HEK cells. In addition, [ 3 H]‐glutamate, in the presence of ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists, has been used to investigate native group II receptors in rat brain membranes (Schoepp & True, 1992; Wright et al , 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although heterologous expression of specific mGluR subtypes can in theory provide almost unlimited supplies of material for pharmacological characterization of putative mGluR agonists/antagonists using radioligand binding methods, few studies have adopted this approach (Thomsen et al, 1993;Laurie et al, 1995) (Schoepp et al, 1991;Manzoni et al, 1992;Jones & Roberts, 1993;Challiss et al, 1994b). In contrast, IR, 3S-ACPD was essentially without effect at concentrations up to 300 gM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel with the cloning and functional characterization of the eight mGluRs which presently constitute the mGluR family (Nakanishi, 1994;Pin & Duvoisin, 1995) has been the synthesis of an increasing array of molecules which exhibit selective agonist or antagonist properties at this class of receptor (Hayashi et al, 1992;1994;Schoepp & Conn, 1993;Birse et al, 1994;Pin & Duvoisin, 1995). Although heterologous expression of specific mGluR subtypes can in theory provide almost unlimited supplies of material for pharmacological characterization of putative mGluR agonists/antagonists using radioligand binding methods, few studies have adopted this approach (Thomsen et al, 1993;Laurie et al, 1995), probably because radiolabelled L-[3H]-glutamate is the only ligand available at present. Thus, the vast majority of pharmacological studies have used the activation or inhibition of particular signal transduction pathways as an index of receptor activation or blockade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted also that in studies where L-[3H]-glutamate binding has been assessed with membranes prepared from clonal cells expressing specific mGluRs, L-AP3 has been shown to displace specfic [3Hl-glutamate binding with Ki values of 298 and 125 giM for mGluRla and mGluR3 (Laurie et al, 1995) respectively, suggesting that L-AP3 interacts directly with the mGluR to affect agonist binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%