2017
DOI: 10.5860/rusq.57.1.6441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifting the Veil: Analyzing Collaborative Virtual Reference Transcripts to Demonstrate Value and Make Recommendations for Practice

Abstract: Extended transcript analysis was used to analyze how our chat reference was being used and make recommendations for practice. Because this analysis was longitudinal (over a year, or at least several months) significant patterns were documented. Several themes were noted that emphasized the unique characteristics of the Community College population. The project documented that chat reference patrons are persistent. The questions that came up about assessing the service underlined the commonalities between virtu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 The most common quantitative methods are simple descriptive count-or frequencybased analyses that are accompanied by qualitative coding-based content analyses. 11 In some recent research, advanced quantitative research methods, such as cluster analysis and topic modeling techniques, have been used, but they have not been fully explored yet with a wide range of techniques. 12…”
Section: Chat Transcript Analysis Methods In Library Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The most common quantitative methods are simple descriptive count-or frequencybased analyses that are accompanied by qualitative coding-based content analyses. 11 In some recent research, advanced quantitative research methods, such as cluster analysis and topic modeling techniques, have been used, but they have not been fully explored yet with a wide range of techniques. 12…”
Section: Chat Transcript Analysis Methods In Library Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies survey academic librarians about their chat reference services and how they train staff to answer chats (Devine, Paladino, & Davis, 2011), while others explore the usefulness of having full-time librarians provide service through chat reference systems (Maloney & Kemp, 2015). Many chat analysis projects take a large-scale qualitative approach by analyzing datasets of academic chat transcripts to show overall improvements over time (Baumgart et al, 2016;Brown, 2017;Dempsey, 2019). Mungin (2017) at James Madison University analyzed chat transcripts in Dedoose over a five-year span in order to improve chat reference; and as recently as 2019, at Utah State University (which has a high population of students studying online), a group of librarians and learning technologists looked at chat trends over a year by analyzing 1600 chat transcripts through coding.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles reporting the results of research on digital reference including chat have been published since the 1990s (Matteson et al , 2011). Topics covered in the last few years of literature have ranged from teaching or instruction in chat (Dempsey, 2016, 2017; Hervieux and Tummon, 2018; Jacoby et al , 2016; Schiller, 2016), the types of questions asked in a chat service (Bourgeois and Bealer, 2020; Brown, 2017; Chen and Wang, 2019; Mavodza, 2019; McKewan and Richmond, 2017; Ozeran and Martin, 2019; Stieve and Wallace, 2018), staffing hours or needs, patron satisfaction with the service (Brown, 2017; Mungin, 2017), the role of cobrowsing (Wan et al , 2009) and communication issues (Westbrook, 2007). Probably the largest and most prolific area has involved service quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%