2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.115410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime of the first and second collective excitations in metallic nanoparticles

Abstract: We determine the lifetime of the surface plasmon in metallic nanoparticles under various conditions, concentrating on the Landau damping, which is the dominant mechanism for intermediate-size particles. Besides the main contribution to the lifetime, which smoothly increases with the size of the particle, our semiclassical evaluation yields an additional oscillating component. For the case of noble metal particles embedded in a dielectric medium, it is crucial to consider the details of the electronic confineme… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
142
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
142
2
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Our result for the Na nanoparticles mainly agrees with a similar results obtained in Refs. 29,30. Experiments on alkaline clusters with a diameter in the range of 10−50Å in vacuum 13 yield a linewidth of the order of Γ ∼ 1 eV.…”
Section: A Plasmon Linewidth In a General Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…21 Our result for the Na nanoparticles mainly agrees with a similar results obtained in Refs. 29,30. Experiments on alkaline clusters with a diameter in the range of 10−50Å in vacuum 13 yield a linewidth of the order of Γ ∼ 1 eV.…”
Section: A Plasmon Linewidth In a General Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…provided that ω ≫ ν s ≫ ν, and (30) provided that ω ≫ ν s and ν s ≪ ν. The factors L and L ⊥ in Eqs.…”
Section: Particular Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surface-assisted plasmon decay (Landau damping) has been extensively studied experimentally [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and theoretically [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] since the pioneering paper by Kawabata and Kubo [44], who have shown that, for a spherical particle of radius a, the surface scattering rate is γ sp = 3v F /4a, where v F is the electron Fermi velocity. In subsequent quantum-mechanical studies carried within random phase approximation (RPA) [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] and timedependent local density approximation (TDLDA) [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] approaches, a more complicated picture has emerged involving the role of confining potential and nonlocal effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%