2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2017.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime of self-reconfigurable batteries compared with conventional batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While providing the mentioned benefits, battery performance is impaired by battery degradation through chronological and utilisation causes. For example, Bouchhima et al [2] explain that the battery health state describe the current EV performance [2]. This health state is influenced by permanent and inevitable degradation [4,16].…”
Section: General Battery Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While providing the mentioned benefits, battery performance is impaired by battery degradation through chronological and utilisation causes. For example, Bouchhima et al [2] explain that the battery health state describe the current EV performance [2]. This health state is influenced by permanent and inevitable degradation [4,16].…”
Section: General Battery Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because after the battery health drops below 80% SoH, the capacity fades rapidly [29]. Thus, the End-of-Life (EOL) of EV batteries is estimated to be 80% SoH [2] i.a. The small lifetime range with regards to the SoH classification therefore needs to be preserved.…”
Section: General Battery Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations