1991
DOI: 10.1021/ac00006a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime of neutral-carrier-based liquid membranes in aqueous samples and blood and the lipophilicity of membrane components

Abstract: On the basis of previously reported correlations between the lipophilicity of membrane components, their partition coefficient between the membrane and the sample, and the lifetime of corresponding neutral-carrier-based sensors, the lipophilicities of ionophores and plasticizers in analytically relevant ion-selective electrodes, ISFETs, and optodes are analyzed and reported. Equations for the estimation of the lifetimes of liquid membranes in continuous-flow systems are presented, and the experimental determin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
157
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is surprising that the formal complex formation constant of V with Ag + is about 300 times lower than that of VI since in a competition experiment with a 1:1 mixture of both ionophores and 0.5 equivalents of Ag + , the 1 H NMR spectrum indicated that V was complexed and VI was not [17]. However, in that experiment in the rather apolar solvent CDCl 3 , the counterion was CF 3 SO 3 − , whereas the sensor membrane investigated here is based on the polar o-NPOE (dielectric constant, 23.9 [48]) and the counterion is a substituted tetraphenylborate, TFPB − . A likely explanation of the observed difference is that the ion pairs with CF 3 SO 3 − in CDCl 3 are strong, whereas with TFPB − in o-NPOE they are weak [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is surprising that the formal complex formation constant of V with Ag + is about 300 times lower than that of VI since in a competition experiment with a 1:1 mixture of both ionophores and 0.5 equivalents of Ag + , the 1 H NMR spectrum indicated that V was complexed and VI was not [17]. However, in that experiment in the rather apolar solvent CDCl 3 , the counterion was CF 3 SO 3 − , whereas the sensor membrane investigated here is based on the polar o-NPOE (dielectric constant, 23.9 [48]) and the counterion is a substituted tetraphenylborate, TFPB − . A likely explanation of the observed difference is that the ion pairs with CF 3 SO 3 − in CDCl 3 are strong, whereas with TFPB − in o-NPOE they are weak [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The lipophilicity of each ionophore was determined based on a method reported by Dinten et al 22 The stationary phase was RP-C18-silica gel (Merck). The mobile phase was anethanolwater mixture in a volume ratio of 7:3.…”
Section: Lipophilicity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the two types of ligands are applied to measurements in physiological samples, they fulfil the theoretically required selectivity coefficients comparable to real conditions in mixed solutions. 25 On the other hand, the relatively low lipophilicity of K22B5 (log PTLC=3.94) does not meet the required lipophilicity of an ionophore for physiological measurements 22,26 (required lipophilicity of an ionophore in continuous measurements of blood serum (30 days, 24 h: log PTLC=8.4).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations