1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01435045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime measurements in the triplet system of Mg I

Abstract: In an atomic beam the metastable 3s3p 3p-states of Mg I were populated by electron impact. A pulsed tunable dye laser was used to excite the metastable atoms to the 3snd 3D-(n = 3 -7) and to the 3sns 3Sl-states (n = 4 and 6). Observing the time dependence of the reemitted resonance light the lifetimes of these states were measured.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic structure of Mg i and technical limitations prevented us from deriving a conclusive value. However, the remeasured value leans towards the measurements by Kwiatkowski et al (1980) and our calculated value. Therefore, we adopted our theoretical lifetime value (9.63 ns) for the 4s 3 S 1 level.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The atomic structure of Mg i and technical limitations prevented us from deriving a conclusive value. However, the remeasured value leans towards the measurements by Kwiatkowski et al (1980) and our calculated value. Therefore, we adopted our theoretical lifetime value (9.63 ns) for the 4s 3 S 1 level.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…of 4s 3 S 1 level to 11.5 ± 1.0 ns. Other experimental studies find the lifetime ranging from 5.8 ns to 14.8 ns (Berry et al 1970;Schaefer 1971;Andersen et al 1972;Havey et al 1977;Kwiatkowski et al 1980). Apparently, there is a large spread in the literature values and a 2 ns difference in lifetime corresponding to a 0.08 dex difference in log(g f ) values.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remarkably, the XCCSD(S) results are close to 42 11.5 ± 1.0 29.0 ± 0.3 − 5.9 ± 0.4 Kwiatkowski(1980) 43 9.7 ± 0.6 − − 5.9 ± 0.4 Andersen(1972) 44 10.1 ± 0.8 − − 6.6 ± 0.5 Schaefer(1971) 39 14.8 ± 0.7 25.6 ± 2.1 − 11.3 ± 0.8 Ueda(1982) 45 9.9 ± 1.25 − − 5.93 Havey(1977) 46 9.7 ± 0.5 − − − Gratton(2003) 38 9. …”
Section: Comparison With the Available Theoretical And Experimentaunclassified