Lifetime dependency relationships and their application to modelling roles and relationship objects

Kaasbøll, Jens; Motschnig-Pitrik, Renate

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35059-2_15

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to deal with other issues as well, e.g., entities that have both form and content, we have defined a more general relation. Since the substance has to exist for the form to exist, the relation is defined to capture this property, and it is called the «lifetime dependency» relation (Kaasbøll and Motschnig-Pitrik 1996). We have demonstrated that this relation is more general than previous solutions to role modelling, including those of Essink and Erhart (1991) and van de Weg and Engmann (1992), because it allows an object to be a role of several objects.…”

Section: A Learning Cycle Bringing In a Semiotic Relationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Human work as context for development of object oriented modelling techniques

Kaasbøll

Smørdal

1996

Method Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Computer systems are increasingly being used for communication and coordination of work, while object-oriented modelling techniques aim at modelling the problem domain of the computer system. Current techniques have been developed with respect to easy implementation, while we argue that further development of the modelling techniques should also be based on knowledge about human work in organisations. We outline a learning cycle of modelling technique and point to where such knowledge should be included. We have carried out two alternative approaches to development of object oriented techniques based on these ideas, and we outline these development processes. One approach is based on semiotic concepts, the other is based on activity theory.

show abstract

Section: A Learning Cycle Bringing In a Semiotic Relationmentioning

confidence: 99%