Human work as context for development of object oriented modelling techniques

Abstract

Computer systems are increasingly being used for communication and coordination of work, while object-oriented modelling techniques aim at modelling the problem domain of the computer system. Current techniques have been developed with respect to easy implementation, while we argue that further development of the modelling techniques should also be based on knowledge about human work in organisations. We outline a learning cycle of modelling technique and point to where such knowledge should be included. We have carried out two alternative approaches to development of object oriented techniques based on these ideas, and we outline these development processes. One approach is based on semiotic concepts, the other is based on activity theory.

Classifying Approaches to Object Oriented Analysis of Work with Activity Theory

“…The method used in this work is presented and discussed by Kaasbøll and Smørdal (1996), who argues that object oriented modelling techniques should be developed according to knowledge about human work within organisations. In order to point to how to bring such knowledge into the process of developing techniques, a learning cycle consisting of practice, evaluation, theoretical contribution, and suggestion of improved techniques is outlined.…”

“…September 1997 real-world domain, to a focus that also include the computer as a mediator in the usage world, e.g., as in groupware or workflow applications. Kaasbøll and Smørdal (1996) argue that this shift of perspectives has not been accompanied with extensions of the theoretical foundation for object oriented modelling. This is a problem for 'pure' object oriented approaches, because OO is a universal approach, and not particularly targeted toward analysis of the usage world.…”