1968
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(68)90036-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime and capture cross-section studies of deep impurities in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), a better fit of the experimental data is obtained. In this case, = 2.4 × 10 -20 m² and = 3 × 10 -19 m², these cross section values are within the experimental range found in the literature [32][33][34][35][36] . In addition to the 3D EFEG model, a second hypothesis has been tested in this paper: the use of a gamma distribution to model the intrinsic dark current level instead of the Gaussian distribution chosen by Domengie et al.…”
Section: Application Of the 3d Electric Field Enhancement Model To Gold Contaminationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…3), a better fit of the experimental data is obtained. In this case, = 2.4 × 10 -20 m² and = 3 × 10 -19 m², these cross section values are within the experimental range found in the literature [32][33][34][35][36] . In addition to the 3D EFEG model, a second hypothesis has been tested in this paper: the use of a gamma distribution to model the intrinsic dark current level instead of the Gaussian distribution chosen by Domengie et al.…”
Section: Application Of the 3d Electric Field Enhancement Model To Gold Contaminationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…where σ o is the capture cross-section at the temperature T o corresponding to the peak position of the DLs in DLTS spectra. For different DLs in silicon, the power index m can be in the range from −4 to 0 [31]. It should be noted that only the data obtained within the temperature range allow us to determine precisely the DL parameters.…”
Section: Jinst 15 P02017mentioning
confidence: 99%