Lifestyles, Do-it-yourself Interior Design Perception, and Experience Differences of Millennial-Z generation Single-person Households

Chung, Miryum

doi:10.14774/jkiid.2020.29.4.021

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on these factors, a cluster analysis was performed to classify the lifestyle of the respondents into clusters: 1 (hobbyists), 2 (value seekers), and 3 (practical types), and cluster 3 was identified as the most common lifestyle type in the university student class. These results are different from previous studies [25,26,33], which emphasized individuality, hobbies, and self-development in the lifestyles of university students. This is because the respondents of the previous study were mainly from the M generation (born between 1981 and 1996), and the subjects of this study were the Z generation (born between 1997 and 2012), unlike the M generation, the Z generation showed lifestyle characteristics that pursue stability and communication with others, while acting cautiously according to their convictions [46].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Lee and Oh [25] classified the belief-oriented lifestyle of university students, young adults, and newlyweds (information-oriented, personality, future, self-development, and practicality). Chung [26] focused on the interests of university students in more detail (style and brand, practicality, social media, expressing individuality, investing in oneself, being conscious of others, planned consumption, and price satisfaction). In these studies, there were differences in residential views and housing choices by lifestyle type [26], and opinions differed according to the characteristics of preferred residential and residential spaces and the importance of external residential environmental factors [25].…”

Section: Lifestyle Of University Students Segmentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Table 1, the questionnaire comprised items in two survey areas: university students' lifestyle evaluations, and opinions on UAPH. The questionnaire factors and items that investigate the lifestyle type of university students based on previous studies [25,26,33,34] are described in detail in Appendix A. In most lifestyle analyses using statistical techniques, fewer than ten categories are clearly separated [6].…”

Section: Specifying Questionnaire Itemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

University Students’ Lifestyle and Opinions for University-Affiliated Public Housing: Focusing on Auxiliary Welfare Facilities and Residential Services

Hwang

Lim

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

University-affiliated public housing (UAPH) is planned for the purpose of coexistence with the local community as well as housing stability for university students. However, shared spaces such as auxiliary welfare facilities planned to achieve that purpose are not being used by residents because no services or programs are provided. Lifestyle is a useful approach for identifying housing preferences in housing projects for special groups that share similar demographic characteristics. Thus, this study analyzed and clustered the lifestyle of university students, and investigated the differences in preferred auxiliary welfare facilities and residential services by cluster. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire survey of 424 university students using an online survey. As a result of the survey, in the factor analysis of university students’ lifestyle types, three categories were identified as individual propensity factors regardless of demographic characteristics except gender. In addition, the characteristics of university students were crucial in examining the preference of auxiliary welfare facilities and residential services of UAPH in terms of community facilities, auxiliary facilities, residential services, and program/operation management. Community facilities showed a high need for academic facilities, a low overall need for residential services, and a high need for program/operational management in terms of cost (housing cost reduction). In this study, there were differences in UAPH opinions according to lifestyle. In particular, many respondents showed a lifestyle that pursued practicality, and accordingly, a preference to utilize practicality, sociality, information, and technology was high. Therefore, for the sustainable operation and management in order to facilitate UAPH construction, the issue of housing cost, including not only rent but also management costs, should be considered most fundamentally, and it is necessary to provide facilities and programs that can provide practical help to the difficulties students face when living alone.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Lifestyle Of University Students Segmentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Specifying Questionnaire Itemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

University Students’ Lifestyle and Opinions for University-Affiliated Public Housing: Focusing on Auxiliary Welfare Facilities and Residential Services

Hwang

Lim

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An Exploratory Study on the Lifestyle Characteristics of the MZ Generation : A Focus on the 2010-2020 Studies

Kang¹

2022

FTRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perceptions of Housing and Housing Improvement Efforts for Single-Person Young Adult Households in the Seoul Metropolitan Area

Chung

2024

JKHA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to investigate the housing conditions of single-person young adult households in the capital region, analyze the contributing factors, segment them into clusters based on housing characteristics, examine the differences among these clusters, and explore the current housing situation and efforts for housing improvement. The study surveyed 519 individuals aged 20-30 living alone in the capital region, and data was collected through an online panel survey from February 28 to March 5, 2020. Various analytical techniques were employed using SPSS v.25, including frequency analysis, cross-tab, ANOVA, factor analysis, cluster analysis, and Generalized Linear Models. The survey covered general information, perceptions of housing, housing conditions, and efforts for housing improvement. The results of the survey revealed that the 27 housing characteristics could be condensed into 10 factors. Based on these housing factors, respondents were categorized into four distinct clusters, each displaying unique characteristics. The housing perception of Cluster 1(N=37) was 'My home is a humble retreat just for me.' That of Cluster 2(N=129) was 'My home is the best in every aspect', Cluster 3(N=206) "My home is a plain and comfortable place that's suitable for everyone.", and Cluster 4(N=147) 'My precious home, reflecting who I am'.

show abstract

Lifestyles, Do-it-yourself Interior Design Perception, and Experience Differences of Millennial-Z generation Single-person Households

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

University Students’ Lifestyle and Opinions for University-Affiliated Public Housing: Focusing on Auxiliary Welfare Facilities and Residential Services

University Students’ Lifestyle and Opinions for University-Affiliated Public Housing: Focusing on Auxiliary Welfare Facilities and Residential Services

An Exploratory Study on the Lifestyle Characteristics of the MZ Generation : A Focus on the 2010-2020 Studies

Perceptions of Housing and Housing Improvement Efforts for Single-Person Young Adult Households in the Seoul Metropolitan Area

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About