2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00829-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifestyle risk factors and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: assessing the influence of reverse causation in a prospective cohort of 457,021 US adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also excluded the first 5 years of follow-up to investigate the influence of confounding by preexisting diseases. 12 In our final sensitivity analysis, we also excluded participants with ≥600 min/wk of physical activity and ≥780 min/wk of physical activity were conducted to account for different exposure variability and to increase comparability between weekend warriors and regularly active participants (ie, relatively few weekend warriors exceeded this level). For statistically significant results in the main analysis, we calculated the E value to estimate the strength of the associations, on the risk ratio scale, of an unmeasured confounder with both exposure and outcome needed to explain away the observed associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also excluded the first 5 years of follow-up to investigate the influence of confounding by preexisting diseases. 12 In our final sensitivity analysis, we also excluded participants with ≥600 min/wk of physical activity and ≥780 min/wk of physical activity were conducted to account for different exposure variability and to increase comparability between weekend warriors and regularly active participants (ie, relatively few weekend warriors exceeded this level). For statistically significant results in the main analysis, we calculated the E value to estimate the strength of the associations, on the risk ratio scale, of an unmeasured confounder with both exposure and outcome needed to explain away the observed associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded participants who had been diagnosed with cancer, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, heart disease, and stroke at baseline (n = 104 345); with missing data for physical activity (n = 11 694); with limitations on their instrumental and other activities of daily living (n = 8345); or who were unable to perform moderate or vigorous physical activity (n = 3362). Of note, the rationale for excluding participants with chronic conditions at baseline was based on previous studies suggesting the influence of reverse causation bias (confounding by preexisting diseases) in cohort studies assessing the association between physical activity and mortality . Lastly, we excluded the first 2 years of follow-up to further mitigate the influence of reverse causation bias, producing a final analytical sample of 350 978 participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We conducted sensitivity analyses: 1) excluding participants who developed dementia during the first two years of follow-up, and 2) excluding participants who reported poor self-rated health to account for the potential influence of reverse causation [30]. We also performed a sensitivity analysis excluding all participants who reported day or night shift work to remove the potential work schedule bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%