Background: Differentiating between true and pseudohyperkalaemia is essential for patient management. Common causes of pseudohyperkalaemia include haemolysis, blood cell dyscrasias and EDTA contamination . One approach to differentiate between them is by checking the renal function, as it is believed that true hyperkalaemia is rare with normal function. This is logical, but there is limited published evidence to support it. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of the eGFR in differentiating true from pseudohyperkalaemia. Methods: GP serum potassium results >6.0 mmol/L from 01/01/2017-31/12/2017, with a repeat within 7 days, were included. Entries were retrospectively classified as true or pseudohyperkalaemia based on the potassium reference change value and reference interval. If the initial sample had a FBC, it was classified as normal/abnormal to remove blood cell dyscrasias. Different eGFR cut-points were used to determine the potential in differentiating true from pseudohyperkalaemia. Results: 272 patients were included with potassium results >6.0 mmol/L, with 145 classified as pseudohyperkalaemia. At an eGFR of 90 ml/min/1.73 m2, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 81% (95% CI: 67-90%), this increased to 86% (95% CI: 66-95%) by removing patients with abnormal FBC. When only patients with an initial potassium â¥6.5 mmol/L were included (regardless of FBC), at an eGFR of >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, the NPV was 100%. Lower NPVs were seen with decreasing eGFR cut-points. Conclusion: Normal renal function was not associated with true hyperkalaemia, making the eGFR a useful tool in predicting true from pseudohyperkalaemia, especially for potassium results â¥6.5 mmol/L