2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-017-9860-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life STEM: A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same study, Mr. Evans described that he believes that treating his students as engineers motivates them and increases their engagement. When compared to students of other middle school teachers using the same curriculum in their middle school life science classes, Mr. Evans's students performed significantly higher on science posttests after completion of the unit (Guzey et al, ). We also studied Mr. Evans's use of teacher talk strategies such as asking thought‐provoking questions and elaborating on students' responses during implementations of three STEM units over 3 years (Guzey & Ring‐Whalen, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same study, Mr. Evans described that he believes that treating his students as engineers motivates them and increases their engagement. When compared to students of other middle school teachers using the same curriculum in their middle school life science classes, Mr. Evans's students performed significantly higher on science posttests after completion of the unit (Guzey et al, ). We also studied Mr. Evans's use of teacher talk strategies such as asking thought‐provoking questions and elaborating on students' responses during implementations of three STEM units over 3 years (Guzey & Ring‐Whalen, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, our recent work has studied a variety of teaching pedagogies and classroom talk in engineering and science units (Aranda et al, 2018;Guzey & Ring-Whalen, 2018;Guzey, Ring-Whalen, Harwell, & Peralta, 2019). In these studies, one teacher's classroom practices heavily reflected the pedagogies espoused in our professional development program as well as demonstrated ways to overcome the challenges to practice laid out by Bybee (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About pedagogy knowledge, teachers might be challenged with how to teach integration. Most of the specific method courses in training institutes are taught separately [54] and curricular activities need to be taught alternatively depending on subject features [55,56]. Therefore, teachers need to shift their habits of teaching to transfer across STEM sub-subjects' boundaries to approach successful STEM education [57].…”
Section: Being a Stem Thinker Before A Stem Teacher For The Stem Educmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, teachers' emphasis on making these connections explicit have been found to increase student learning. Guzey and colleagues found that, over three years of teaching integrated STEM, a teacher went from implicit integration to more explicit integration, and each year, his students had more learning gains in the relevant science gains than the year before (Guzey, Ring-Whalen, Harwell, & Peralta, 2017). While these curricula and teacher pedagogical factors are not all of the factors encompassing the connection of standards-based content to engineering design, the literature presented here shows some of what is possible and some pitfalls to be avoided when implementing engineering integration targeted at increasing science and mathematics content knowledge.…”
Section: The Engineering In K-12 Education: Understanding the Status mentioning
confidence: 99%