2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-015-9345-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Paths of Migrants: A Sequence Analysis of Polish Migrants’ Family Life Trajectories

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONThe family-life dynamics of international migrants have become a core topic in demographic studies over the past decades (Kulu & Gonzalez-Ferrer 2014). These studies have focused on different aspects of family-life behavior. For instance, previous research shows that international migration and partner selection are frequently interrelated (Milewski 2003), that moving over long distances influences the stability of a union (Frank & Wildsmith 2005, Boyle et al. 2008, and that migration may alter fer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although OM is by far the most frequently used metric for sequence analysis in the social sciences, the literature is still inconclusive about the best solution for specifying the costs of the three operations (Gauthier et al 2009;Hollister 2009). In this study, we opt for unitary insertion/deletion costs and empirically define substitution costs as the inverse of the transition rates, following the approach of previous studies (e.g., Aassve, Billari, and Piccarreta 2007;Kleinepier, de Valk, and van Gaalen 2015;Widmer and Ritschard 2009). As a robustness check, we replicate our analyses by using another commonly applied solution for calculating OM distances: insertion/deletion costs of 1 and a constant substitution cost of 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although OM is by far the most frequently used metric for sequence analysis in the social sciences, the literature is still inconclusive about the best solution for specifying the costs of the three operations (Gauthier et al 2009;Hollister 2009). In this study, we opt for unitary insertion/deletion costs and empirically define substitution costs as the inverse of the transition rates, following the approach of previous studies (e.g., Aassve, Billari, and Piccarreta 2007;Kleinepier, de Valk, and van Gaalen 2015;Widmer and Ritschard 2009). As a robustness check, we replicate our analyses by using another commonly applied solution for calculating OM distances: insertion/deletion costs of 1 and a constant substitution cost of 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence analysis and its related typology techniques have been widely applied in studying life course trajectories in the social sciences (e.g. Kleinepier, de Valk & Gaalen, (2015); Helske Steele, Kokko, Räikkönen & Eerola, (2014)). The second strategy uses a probabilistic model that describes an observed life course sequence of categorical values as resulting from the conditional probabilities that define membership of a latent class and is called Latent Class Analysis (LCA) (Hagenaars & McCutcheon, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-four percent of all respondents (7649 respondents in total) left their e-mail address to be used in future studies on migration, and even more people agreed to be contacted again in a recent study of Polish migrants in the UK (Platt et al 2015). In contrast to previous studies (e.g., Schneider and Holman 2011), it would be best for the subsequent waves of the study to include those who have already returned home or re-emigrated (using an adjusted return-migrant questionnaire, similar to Krings et al 2013), thus avoiding the potential bias caused by the fact that those who are not successful (e.g., the unemployed) or, by contrast, those who have achieved their emigration goals, are likely to return to their home countries (Kleinepier et al 2015;Stark 1991). In order to ensure the comparability of the first and subsequent waves of the study and to enable a comparison of various newcomer cohorts, the next waves should focus not just on those who expressed interest in participating in the first wave of the study, but essentially on replicating the research design of the first wave of the study -a similar strategy as used in the POLPAN longitudinal panel survey.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%