1940
DOI: 10.2307/3796265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life History Notes on the Banner-Tailed Kangaroo Rat, Merriam's Kangaroo Rat, and the White-Throated Wood Rat in Arizona and New Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is pertinent, therefore, to mention the necessity of observing directly specific items in the stomach contents of the rodents rather than using simplified methods of cheek pouch content analysis (for example, Chapman, 1972;Reynolds, 1958) or gross observation of stomach contents (Bradley and Mauer, 1971) to determine the diets of rodents. Perhaps some authors have considered it infeasible to attempt to determine the specific diets of rodents either because the mass of stomach contents appeared to be too variable to determine specific items (Bradley and Mauer, 1971; Monson and Kessler, 1940) or because the rodents were thought to husk their seeds, leaving only unidentifiable endosperm or cotyledonous material in the stomach. Neither of these problems has been evident during this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is pertinent, therefore, to mention the necessity of observing directly specific items in the stomach contents of the rodents rather than using simplified methods of cheek pouch content analysis (for example, Chapman, 1972;Reynolds, 1958) or gross observation of stomach contents (Bradley and Mauer, 1971) to determine the diets of rodents. Perhaps some authors have considered it infeasible to attempt to determine the specific diets of rodents either because the mass of stomach contents appeared to be too variable to determine specific items (Bradley and Mauer, 1971; Monson and Kessler, 1940) or because the rodents were thought to husk their seeds, leaving only unidentifiable endosperm or cotyledonous material in the stomach. Neither of these problems has been evident during this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Shrews cache seeds before insects and both before mice, apparently in order of resistance to spoilage (74). The large seed caches of desert heteromyids (77,101) are maintained in areas with 100% relative humidity (53) and apparently will rapidly succumb to molds and bacteria if they are not actively managed by the rodents (92, 94a). Although we do not know the details of the management procedures, heteromyids may take advantage of the beneficial aspects of the mold/seed/caching relationship by actually preferring slightly moldy seeds to unmoldy and very moldy seeds (92, 94a).…”
Section: The Defense Of Stored Food From Microbesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In North American desert communities of heteromyid rodents, it is the largest species that larder hoard large quantities of seeds in their elaborate burrows (44,76,77,131). Some intermediate-sized heteromyids make hun dreds of small surface caches near their burrow entrances.…”
Section: The Defense Of Stored Food From Interspecific Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of breeding and rearing the young, heteromyids are solitary (Martin, 1977;Monson and Kessler, 1940). They maintain 5-7 burrows within their home ranges (Chapman and Packard, 1974).…”
Section: Natural Historymentioning
confidence: 99%