2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life evaluation of organic coatings on hydraulic metal structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEM morphology shows that the surface of t 2 coating is smooth at the beginning, but as the solution diffuses, and especially un cyclic high and low temperature action, some micro-cracks and tiny holes soon ap the surface of the coating. This can be seen in Figure 4b, which shows via digita microscope that microcracks had appeared on the coating surface after 20 days These micro-cracks and holes cause an increase in the surface roughness and le rapid drop in gloss [46,47,48,49]. The gloss of the FW-2 coating does not chang after 20 days of immersion, which is consistent with the surface micromorphology in Figure 4.…”
Section: Glossiness and Color Difference Analysis Of Two Coating Samplessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The SEM morphology shows that the surface of t 2 coating is smooth at the beginning, but as the solution diffuses, and especially un cyclic high and low temperature action, some micro-cracks and tiny holes soon ap the surface of the coating. This can be seen in Figure 4b, which shows via digita microscope that microcracks had appeared on the coating surface after 20 days These micro-cracks and holes cause an increase in the surface roughness and le rapid drop in gloss [46,47,48,49]. The gloss of the FW-2 coating does not chang after 20 days of immersion, which is consistent with the surface micromorphology in Figure 4.…”
Section: Glossiness and Color Difference Analysis Of Two Coating Samplessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Nowadays, coating protection performance is usually evaluated according to the following coating characteristics: The physical and chemical changes, such as the gloss loss (Guseva et al , 2003; Evans, 2012), the color change (Lee and Chang, 2016), the emergence of rust (Kim and Itoh, 2007), the adhesion failure (Zhang et al , 2020a; Zhang et al , 2020b; Meng et al , 2017) and the occurrence of blistering (Latif et al , 2017; Chuang and Nguyen, 1997; Bethencourt et al , 2004; Xu et al , 2021; Zheng et al , 2021). The electrochemical resistance reduction, such as the decreased coating resistance (Cmaitland and Mayne, 1962; Deflotian et al , 2008; Yong et al , 2021) and the reduced low frequency modulus (Bierwagen et al , 2001; Shreeoathi et al , 2011; Su et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical and chemical changes, such as the gloss loss (Guseva et al , 2003; Evans, 2012), the color change (Lee and Chang, 2016), the emergence of rust (Kim and Itoh, 2007), the adhesion failure (Zhang et al , 2020a; Zhang et al , 2020b; Meng et al , 2017) and the occurrence of blistering (Latif et al , 2017; Chuang and Nguyen, 1997; Bethencourt et al , 2004; Xu et al , 2021; Zheng et al , 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an effective barrier to corrosion media, organic coating is one of the most popular corrosion protection approaches [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Since organic coating is usually more protective and relatively low cost, and can be more easily applied to large structures than other coating techniques, it is often the first option, particularly for heavy-duty anti-corrosion [9,10] in marine environments [11,12], where many factors, such as solar radiation, high salinity, hot-cold alternation, wet-dry cycling and micro and macro living species, can significantly exacerbate the environment corrosivity and dramatically accelerate the coating degradation [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%