2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
194
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
194
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a need for more detailed and effective cooperation in all stages of a prefabricated building including design, procurement, prefabrication, transportation, on-site assembly, construction, installation, declaration, and operation. Component transportation from the factory to the site is also a critical problem affecting the supply chain integration [32]. Arditi et al and Polat investigated factors affecting the use of prefabricated concrete systems in 1995 and 2008, respectively, in the U.S.…”
Section: Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a need for more detailed and effective cooperation in all stages of a prefabricated building including design, procurement, prefabrication, transportation, on-site assembly, construction, installation, declaration, and operation. Component transportation from the factory to the site is also a critical problem affecting the supply chain integration [32]. Arditi et al and Polat investigated factors affecting the use of prefabricated concrete systems in 1995 and 2008, respectively, in the U.S.…”
Section: Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The designer must consider the specific modules and component constitutions as well as their precise assembly [39]. Complex modules need more design work because they produce more subsequent prefabrication work, transportation work, assembly work, and coordination work [32]. A good design can enhance the value of the building while an incompetent design may lead to poor construction quality (e.g., cracks, leakage, joint failure) [34].…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the construction of IB has modified the situation. Most of the work is not performed on site (because of factorial prefabrication [65], on-site construction has considerably declined [21]), mechanization is used for reducing risk and intensifying labor [66], and atmospheric conditions at the construction site are enhanced; therefore, the safety and health of employees are guaranteed [67] and the chances of accidents are declined [25]. …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sustainability practices identified are: (1) prefabrication, preassembly, modularization, and offsite construction (PPMOF) evaluation [20,[43][44][45]48,49,52,54,56,57]; (2) startup processes and systems [20,42,46,47]; (3) meeting startup quality [20,42,46,47]; (4) community relations [15,20,[58][59][60][61][62]; (5) life cycle cost analysis [20,32,36,48,50,57,61,63]; (6) regulatory requirement, permitting, and environment [15,20,35,60,61,[64][65][66]; and (7) sustainability [20,35,64,66]. The description and sources of sustainability practices from the literature review are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Identifying Sustainability Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PPMOF has multiple sustainable impacts for construction: (1) improve productivity and reduce cost (economic); (2) improve workers' safety at the construction site (social); and (3) control and reduce environmental impacts (environmental) [20,[43][44][45]48,49,52,54,56,57]. Therefore, the evaluation of the PPMOF practice is usually implemented in the front-end planning phase, and associated with all three sustainability dimensions: environmental, social, and economic.…”
Section: Identifying Sustainability Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%