Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Garbage-Classification Based Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems: A Comparative Case Study in China

Abstract

Confronted with a series of problems caused by surging generation of municipal solid waste (MSW), the Chinese central and local governments have promulgated and implemented policies to deal with them, including promotions of the classification of MSW. However, to date, practical knowledge and understanding about benefits for garbage classification from its environmental performance perspective is still limited. The present study is purposed to comprehensively investigate the environmental effects of garbage classification on municipal solid waste management (MSWM) systems based on three proposed garbage classification scenarios in China, via a comparative life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Taking advantage of Impact Assessment of Chemical Toxics (IMPACT) 2002+ method, this comparative LCIA study can quantitatively evaluate midpoint, endpoint, and single scored life cycle impacts for the studied MSWM systems. A Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis is carried out to test the effectiveness and reliabilities of the LCIA results. The LCIA and uncertainty analysis results show that MSWM systems based on various garbage classification scenarios have significant variations in the studied midpoint, endpoint, and single scored environmental impacts. Different garbage classification scenarios have their individual environmental-friendly superiority for specific impact categories. Overall, results of this study demonstrate that MSW treatment systems integrated with garbage classification are more environmentally friendly by comparison with non-classification; and that the more elaborate the level of MSW classification, the smaller its impacts on the environment.

Climate Change Impact of the Development in Household Waste Management in China

“…We have found no comprehensive assessment of the climate change impacts of the development in the municipal waste management system, moving from landfilling to incineration supplemented by source separation of food waste and biorefining. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) has been used to quantify the climate change aspects of waste management in China, − but Yuan et al pointed at the limited amount of studies and, in particular, noticed that only few studies consider separate collection at source . In general, the studies find from a climate change point of view that incineration is better than landfilling and that anaerobic digestion may further reduce its impact.…”

Spatiotemporal heterogeneities in water and land appropriations related to food losses and waste in China

“…In the food waste treatment stage, China's food waste recycling system is fragile due to insufficient collection infrastructure and inadequate treatment facilities (Thi et al 2015), and the waste treatment capacity is only 20−3990 t day −1 (Li et al 2019). The Chinese garbage classification policy has come into operation in several cities; however, it requires vigorous promotion (Yuan et al 2020). Waste treatment plants and related technologies should also be established and upgraded.…”

Does Environmental Policy Help Green Industry? Evidence from China’s Promotion of Municipal Solid Waste Sorting

“…The mixed-ownership reform in the green industry, which is aiming to establish a more efficient and modern enterprise system [ 95 ], is believed to benefit non-SOEs’ financing and development. By bringing in and mixing multiple types of investors and exploring flexible and market-based salary systems, mixed-ownership reform can help to overcome the shortcomings that SOEs have such as the weaker motivation to innovate and lower efficiency [ 96 ], whereas non-SOEs could gain the synergy of both state support and private business strength, therefore enhancing their sustainable development. The green industry in China has already provided evidence that non-SOEs who accepted support from SOEs had successfully solved their financing difficulties and were recovered obviously, such as Beijing SPC Environment Protection Tech Co Ltd (002573)’s net cashflow in 2019 increasing 26.7%, where this enterprise just achieved its mixed-ownership reform in 2019.…”