Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Water Intensity of Cellulosic Biofuel Production Using Cholinium Lysinate Ionic Liquid Pretreatment

Abstract

Abstract:Cellulosic biofuels present an opportunity to meet a significant fraction of liquid transportation fuel demand with renewable, low-carbon alternatives. Certain ionic liquids (ILs) have proven effective at facilitating hydrolysis of lignocellulose to produce fermentable sugars with high yields. Although their negligible vapor pressure and low flammability make ILs attractive solvents at the point of use, their life-cycle environmental impacts have not been investigated in the context of cellulosic biorefineries. This study provides the first life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) and water use inventory for biofuels produced using IL pretreatment. We explore two corn stover-to-ethanol process configurations: conventional water-wash (WW) route and the more recently developed integrated high gravity (iHG) route, which eliminates washing steps after pretreatment. Our results are based on the use of a representative IL, cholinium lysinate ([Ch][Lys]). We find that the WW process results in unacceptably high GHG emissions. The iHG process has the potential to reduce GHG emissions per MJ fuel by ~45% relative to gasoline if [Ch][Lys] is used. Use of a protic IL with comparable performance to [Ch][Lys] could achieve GHG reductions up to 70-85%. The water-intensities of the WW and iHG processes are both comparable to other cellulosic biofuel technologies. Keywords: Biomass pretreatment; Cholinium lysinate; Ionic liquid; Life-cycle assessment; Water intensityIntroduction:

Techno-economic analysis and life-cycle greenhouse gas mitigation cost of five routes to bio-jet fuel blendstocks

“…Unless otherwise specified, the process models use assumptions consistent with the feedstock supply logistics analyses conducted by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) 29, 30 and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), [31][32][33] the downstream conversion process developed by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), [34][35][36] and similar previous studies [37][38][39] conducted at the DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI). All dollar values are reported in 2018 U.S. dollars.…”

Techno‐economic and greenhouse gas analyses of lignin valorization to eugenol and phenolic products in integrated ethanol biorefineries

“…The plot compares the values between the base case, phenolics case, and the reference for gasoline as well as a value for an IL‐based ethanol production process previously reported in the literature. The values are compared with the values in the literature, with the difference being due mainly to the different feedstocks, electricity mix, and agricultural inputs to the system. In the present case study for El Fuerte biorefinery, there was no export electricity as a co‐product in the base case mainly due to the biomass composition.…”

“…The base case in this study consists of an integrated high‐gravity biorefinery process developed at the Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) for bioethanol production with IL pretreatment, where lignin is used for the on‐site energy supply . The process flowsheet is simplified in Fig.…”

“…For an optimized ‘one‐pot’ process using IL pretreatment and recovering 65% of lignin as a marketable raw material, an MESP of $2.8 gal −1 has been projected . A lifecycle analysis of the process has shown a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 45% relative to gasoline (reaching 70–85% in a future optimized case) . However, the impact on both costs and GHG emissions of the integration of a specific lignin upgrading route within an ethanol biorefinery has yet to be analyzed.…”

Strategies for near-term scale-up of cellulosic biofuel production using sorghum and crop residues in the US

“…The advanced biofuel and cellulosic biofuel categories require net GHG emissions reductions of 50% and 60% relative to petroleum fuels, respectively. Liquid biofuels from crop residues can far exceed these requirements, achieving GHG reductions of up to 90%, although this is dependent on allocation methods applied as part of the life-cycle assessment [20][21][22][23][24]. Forage sorghum-to-ethanol can meet the 50% GHG reduction needed to meet the advanced biofuel requirements and sweet sorghum systems have the potential to achieve reductions well beyond the 60% requirement for cellulosic biofuels [25].…”