Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

Retrofitting coal‐fired power plants with biomass co‐firing and carbon capture and storage for net zero carbon emission: A plant‐by‐plant assessment framework

“…Yang et al. (2019) also have discussed this question and their result shows that the net‐zero co‐firing ratio is 25%. Comparing these two researches, there are still many differences.…”

“…3.3 | Net zero co-firing ratio results and the carbon emission estimation of different power plants Figure 11 draws the carbon emission curve for each power plant and this graph shows that all power plants can achieve net zero emission at the co-firing ratio between 40% and 50%. Yang et al (2019) also have discussed this question and their result shows that the net-zero co-firing ratio is 25%. Comparing these two researches, there are still many differences.…”

“…These studies usually use a representative power plant as case study or make different assumptions to quantify the parameters of the power plant. Yang et al (2019) quantified the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co-firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The result shows that co-firing ratio of 25% can achieve near-zero emission.…”

“…Yang et al. (2019) quantified the performance parameters of different power plants and the influence of the co‐firing ratio on various environmental impact categories. The result shows that co‐firing ratio of 25% can achieve near‐zero emission.…”

Multi-Objective Target-Oriented Robust Optimization of Biomass Co-Firing Networks Under Quality Uncertainty

“…Climate change may be mitigated through advancing renewable energy sources, developing energy efficiency, and implementing carbon capture and storage technologies. However, these strategies are still limited by techno-economic and environmental bottlenecks [4].…”