2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of a LID-BMP treatment train system: A case study in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all material used in this Sponge City projects, PVC pipes and impermeable membranes (primarily made of polyethylene (PE)) take significant proportions, in total carbon emission which are, even though the consumption amount of these two materials is not much compared to concrete and other materials. This result is consistent with the research of Xu et al [52], which showed that the consumption of PVC and fabric contributed significantly to carbon emissions from the LID-BMPs construction phase. The production process of plastics is complicated, thus the amount of carbon emissions from their production phase is relatively huge.…”
Section: Carbon Emissionssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Among all material used in this Sponge City projects, PVC pipes and impermeable membranes (primarily made of polyethylene (PE)) take significant proportions, in total carbon emission which are, even though the consumption amount of these two materials is not much compared to concrete and other materials. This result is consistent with the research of Xu et al [52], which showed that the consumption of PVC and fabric contributed significantly to carbon emissions from the LID-BMPs construction phase. The production process of plastics is complicated, thus the amount of carbon emissions from their production phase is relatively huge.…”
Section: Carbon Emissionssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Examples of this can be found in literature on the sustainability of GI. Comprehensive life cycle cost-benefit assessments where both multiple functions and embedded material impacts are included are typically found only for single technologies or installations, such as a green roof project (Blackhurst, Hendrickson, & Matthews, 2010), a stormwater treatment trail (Xu, Hong, Jia, Liang, & Xu, 2017), or a rain garden (Flynn & Traver, 2013). When assessments are scaled up to compare alternative technologies, focus typically lies on either benefits/performance or impacts/costs: Assessments of multiple performance for alternative GI solutions on a specific site tend to not fully consider life cycle impacts (Fioretti, Palla, Lanza, & Principi, 2010;William et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further recommendations include, "urging local governments to adopt sponge city regulations and permits to alleviate water quality and urban pluvial flooding issues, fully measuring and accounting for economic and environmental benefits, A life cycle assessment of a GI treatment train in China showed that, "climate change, human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity and fossil depletion dominantly contributed to the overall environmental effect. (Xu et al, 2017)" The sustainability benefits of GI designs, including rain gardens, green roofs, porous pavements, and tree plantings, was evaluated using emergy analysis. Dominant inputs for all systems were stone and soil.…”
Section: Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning (Lidar) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%