Life cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina for export

Abstract

Background, aim and scope Regional specificities are a key factor when analyzing the environmental impact of a biofuel pathway through a life cycle assessment (LCA). Due to different energy mixes, transport distances, agricultural practices and land use changes, results can significantly vary from one country to another. The Republic of Argentina is the first exporter of soybean oil and meal and the third largest soybean producer in the world, and therefore, soybean-based biodiesel production is expected to significantly increase in the near future, mostly for exportation. Moreover, Argentinean biodiesel producers will need to evaluate the environmental performances of their product in order to comply with sustainability criteria being developed. However, because of regional specificities, the environmental performances of this biofuel pathway can be expected to be different from those obtained for other countries and feedstocks previously studied. This work aims at analyzing the environmental impact of soybean-based biodiesel production in Argentina for export. The relevant impact categories account for the primary non-renewable energy consumption (CED), the global warming potential (GWP), the eutrophication potential (EP), the acidification potential (AP), the terrestrial ecotoxicity (TE), the aquatic ecotoxicity (AE), the human toxicity (HT) and land use competition (LU). The paper tackles the feedstock and country specificities in biodiesel production by comparing the results of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina with other reference cases. Emphasis is put on explaining the factors that contribute most to the final results and the regional specificities that lead to different results for each biodiesel pathway. Materials and methods The Argentinean (AR) biodiesel pathway was modelled through an LCA and was compared with reference cases available in the ecoinvent® 2.01 database, namely, soybean-based biodiesel production in Brazil (BR) and the United States (US), rapeseed-based biodiesel production in the European Union (EU) and Switzerland (CH) and palm-oil-based biodiesel production in Malaysia (MY). In all cases, the systems were modelled from feedstock production to biodiesel use as B100 in a 28 t truck in CH. Furthermore, biodiesel pathways were compared with fossil low-sulphur diesel produced and used in CH. The LCA was performed according to the ISO standards. The life cycle inventory and the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) were performed in Excel spreadsheets using the ecoinvent® 2.01 database. The cumulative energy demand (CED) and the GWP were estimated through the CED for fossil and nuclear energy and the IPCC 2001 (climate change) LCIA methods, respectively. Other impact categories were assessed according to CML 2001, as implemented in ecoinvent. As the product is a fuel for transportation (service), the system was defined for one vehicle kilometre (functional unit) and was divided into seven unit processes, namely, agricultural phase, soybean oil extraction and refining, transesteri...

The Glasgow consensus on the delineation between pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment for LCA

“…In order to at least provide meaningful emission estimates, LCA practitioners and developers proposed generic assumptions regarding varying percentages of applied active ingredient emitted to environmental media (Margni et al 2002;Audsley et al 2003;Panichelli et al 2008) and in greenhouses (Antón et al 2004;Juraske et al 2007). Furthermore, a number of very different (i.e.…”

Evaluating the environmental sustainability of energy crops: A life cycle assessment of Spanish rapeseed and Argentinean soybean cultivation

“…The same occurs with studies on soybean LCA that have been carried out to date (e.g. Kim & Dale, 2009;Panichelli et al, 2009;Hou et al, 2011;Mohammadi et al, 2013). Moreover, most previous studies were limited to energy and GHG emissions, thus excluding other environmental impacts that are relevant throughout the agricultural process.…”

Contribution to the environmental impact assessment of biodiesel in the context of Spain

“…Some examples are the studies by Panichelli et al (2009) about the soybean expansion in Argentina (entailing deforestation in El Chaco); Reijnders and Huijbregts (2008), considering the transformation of rainforest and the Cerrado savannah for soybean production in Brazil; or Wicke et al (2008), who analyzed GHG emissions from CPO production in Malaysia under different land conversion options (from peatland, natural rainforest, logged-over forest and degraded land). All of them included emissions from direct land conversion when assessing the global warming impact; this is an important aspect when the original land use implies large carbon pools, namely biomass, dead wood, litter and soil.…”

“…In the case of UCO biodiesel, maintenance and depreciation costs represent less than 4% of the product price. Hence, capital goods in the soybean ME production were also neglected, as they were by Panichelli et al (2009).…”

“…In scenario 1, the complete inventory for the soybean biodiesel pathway in Argentina was provided by Panichelli et al (2009). Soybean farming was modeled accordingly, but all the inputs were calculated as a weighted average of the four studied production systems.…”