2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-019-01375-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene Terephthalate Packaging: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, plastic packaging materials, especially in the form of flexible configurations, provide environmental advantages and benefits over other materials, especially rigid configurations. For example, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) has demonstrated better environmental performance than traditional materials (e.g., aluminum and glass) in terms of consumption of natural resources and emissions [ 4 ]. In another work, it was demonstrated that bag-in-box and aseptic cartons had lower environmental impacts compared to single-use glass bottles for wine for all the impact categories considered by the authors, such as global warming potential, water consumption, and land use [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, plastic packaging materials, especially in the form of flexible configurations, provide environmental advantages and benefits over other materials, especially rigid configurations. For example, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) has demonstrated better environmental performance than traditional materials (e.g., aluminum and glass) in terms of consumption of natural resources and emissions [ 4 ]. In another work, it was demonstrated that bag-in-box and aseptic cartons had lower environmental impacts compared to single-use glass bottles for wine for all the impact categories considered by the authors, such as global warming potential, water consumption, and land use [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the series of synthetic polymers present in the plastic market and especially in the food-packaging field, one of the most used is PET, with a global production of 30.3 × 10 6 tons in 2017 [ 38 ], and consequently the most present one in plastics urban waste, followed by PE and PP. Its performance, characteristics and environmental impact were compared with biodegradable polymers coming from renewable resources.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycling non-degradable plastics significantly reduces this waste environmental damage by reducing the accumulation in the environment and reducing the need for oil mining (Bataineh 2020a). Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an objective process for assessing the environmental effects associated with certain products, processes, or activities that are performed in the process of recycling PET waste, and shows the recycling results in a significant reduction in biological impact, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and fossil fuel consumption, and eventually, compared with other PET disposal schemes (Saleh 2016;Zhang and Wen 2014;Nakatani et al 2010;Gomes et al 2019). High recycling rates lead to high net environmental benefits, so the use of PET waste to product manufacture is increasing that social and environmental values have led to this growth (Foolmaun and Ramjeeawon 2013;Zhang et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%