Life cycle assessment of fresh fish product in various scale of capture fisheries facilities

Fatehah, Lu’lu’atul; Suwondo, Endy; Guritno, Adi Djoko; Supartono, Wahyu

doi:10.1063/1.4958561

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fasilitas penangkapan ikan berskala kecil membutuhkan energi dan menghasilkan emisi yang lebih tinggi untuk mengangkut 1 kg produk ikan segar dibandingkan fasilitas yang lebih besar. Namun, untuk setiap perjalanan, dampak lingkungan yang ditimbulkan oleh skala tersebut lebih rendah dibandingkan fasilitas penangkapan ikan skala besar (Fatehah et al, 2016).…”

Section: Inefisiensi Unit Pengolahan Ikanunclassified

Penyebab dan Dampak Ekologis dari Susut Hasil Produksi Ikan di Indonesia

Ibnu Budiman,

Dita Wisudyawati,

Afifah Azzahra

2023

Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perikanan Laut Berkelanjutan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industri perikanan tangkap dan akuakultur menyediakan 15%-20% pasokan protein global (Escobar et al., 2018). Isu ketahanan pangan terkait dengan interaksi antara sektor pertanian dan lingkungan, sosial ekonomi, dan faktor kebijakan/politik. Interaksi tersebut salah satunya dapat dilihat pada kejadian sampah makanan yang mengancam ketahanan pangan (Kementerian Pertanian, 2019).Kehilangan pangan (food loss) dalam dunia perikanan mencakup tiga kategori, sebagai berikut.

show abstract

Section: Inefisiensi Unit Pengolahan Ikanunclassified

Penyebab dan Dampak Ekologis dari Susut Hasil Produksi Ikan di Indonesia

Ibnu Budiman,

Dita Wisudyawati,

Afifah Azzahra

2023

Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perikanan Laut Berkelanjutan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There have been several LCA studies on Indonesian aquatic products, including those from capture (Fatehah et al, 2016;Sofiah & Yani, 2018;Supartono, 2002) and aquaculture systems (Henriksson et al, 2017(Henriksson et al, , 2019Mungkung et al, 2013;Poernomo et al, 2020). In addition to system boundaries and impact categories, the types and numbers of commodities examined in these studies also vary widely.…”

Section: The Purpose Of This Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to system boundaries and impact categories, the types and numbers of commodities examined in these studies also vary widely. For example, Sofiah and Yani (2018) used multicommodity in their research work without taking into account fishing activities, while Fatehah et al (2016) andSupartono (2002) only evaluate the environmental impact of landed fish. None of these studies have specifically addressed BSC, which is the fourth most important export commodity from the fisheries sector.…”

Section: The Purpose Of This Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Life cycle assessment of Indonesian canned crab (Portunus pelagicus)

Wiloso

Romli

Nugraha

et al. 2022

J of Industrial Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesia is an archipelagic country with abundant marine wealth that makes it the world's second largest producer of fish after China. While most of Indonesia's capture marine fisheries (80%) are consumed domestically, around 90% of blue swimming crab (BSC) products are exported, mainly in cans. This makes up almost half of all BSC products on the global market, with the United States and the European Union being the main importers. We carried out a life cycle assessment (LCA) of canned BSC products from Indonesia. Our LCA evaluated the production of "one tonne of canned BSC" at market as a functional unit (FU), with a cradle-to-market system boundary, encompassing wild capture, preprocessing, processing, and distribution to the port of destination at home and abroad. The processing stage was found to be the highest contributor (hotspot) for most of the impact categories considered, mainly due to the use of tin cans for packaging. Despite producing less by-catch, BSC caught with traps resulted in around threefold greater global warming impact per FU than those caught using nets.We also concluded that BSC meat produced in Java is environmentally preferable to that from Sumatra, as most of the shells were sold as coproducts. In addition to recycling and substitution of packaging materials, environmental improvements can also be obtained by increasing the number of shell-processing facilities outside Java. The results of this study can be used by the Indonesian government to develop more sustainable practices to avoid overexploitation of BSC and limit its environmental impacts. K E Y W O R D Sblue swimming crab, environmental impacts, hotspot analysis, industrial ecology, marine capture fisheries, packaging materials INTRODUCTION Global seafood marketGlobal demand for aquatic foods (here referred to as any edible aquatic organism, excluding seaweed) is projected to increase by over 40% between 2018 and 2030 (FAO, 2020a), driven by growing populations and demographic shifts (Gephart et al., 2017). China, as the largest consumer, producer, importer, and exporter of seafood in the world, is likely to see seafood consumption outstrip domestic production by 2030 (Crona et al.,

show abstract

Carbon footprint of frozen pangasius fillet: a case study

Poernomo

Suryanto

Sujuliyani

2020

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon footprint has become an important issue in the world trade, and can potentially be incorporated into sustainability and ecolabel certification schemes. As the leading seafood producers, Indonesia should start to reduce the carbon footprint of its seafood products, especially those destined for export, to minimize the impact on the environment and to safeguard its product in the world market. The present study aimed to determine the carbon footprint of frozen pangasius fillets produced at PT. KMM, Purwakarta. The carbon footprint was calculated using the Life Cycle Assessment method with a standard emission factor during 3-month observation covering post-harvest, processing, and distribution. Results showed that the total carbon footprint of frozen pangasius fillets was 1.48 kg CO2eq/kg product. The highest emission was in the processing, freezing, and storage, i.e., about 71% (mainly from electricity, ice, and refrigerant), of which refrigerant contributed 41%. The lowest CO2 emission was in the administration office and lighting (1.4%).

show abstract

Life cycle assessment of fresh fish product in various scale of capture fisheries facilities

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Penyebab dan Dampak Ekologis dari Susut Hasil Produksi Ikan di Indonesia

Penyebab dan Dampak Ekologis dari Susut Hasil Produksi Ikan di Indonesia

Life cycle assessment of Indonesian canned crab (Portunus pelagicus)

Carbon footprint of frozen pangasius fillet: a case study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About