Life cycle assessment of cotton T-shirts in China

Abstract

Purpose Nowadays, environmental sustainability of textile has gained much attention from government and suppliers due to the resource consumption and pollutant emissions. Besides, different consumer behaviors can result in quite different environmental consequences mainly in terms of water and energy consumption. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically evaluate the environmental impacts of textiles from a life cycle perspective to improve the sustainability of textiles especially for China, the biggest producer, exporter, and consumer in the world. Methods This study is conducted according to the International Organizations for Standardization's (ISO) 14040 standard series. The declared unit is a piece of 100 % cotton short-sleeved T-shirt. The production data mainly come from field investigations of representative mills in China. The use-phase data are mainly from 924 questionnaires of Chinese residents. The secondary data from databases, literatures, and authoritative statistical data are supplemented in case primary data are not available. The potential environmental impacts are evaluated using the CML2001 and USEtox methodologies built into the GaBi version 6.0 software. We determine hotspots throughout the life cycle of the cotton textile considering the impact categories of abiotic depletion, acidification potential, global warming potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, eutrophication potential, water use, and toxicity. Results and discussionThe results of the study show that cotton cultivation, dyeing, making-up, and use-phases are the main contributors to the environmental impacts. In particular, fertilizer, pesticide, and water use in cotton cultivation, coal, dyes, and auxiliaries use in dyeing, electricity use in making-up, detergent and water use in washing, and electricity use in spinning are the hotspots based on the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results. The use-phase scenario analysis shows that compared with machine washing, electric drying, and ironing share the majority of electricity consumption. Compared with Americans, Chinese washing habits are much more environmental-friendly and bring much lower environmental impacts in the use stage. Conclusions Energy consumption, chemical use, and water use are main contributors to most impact categories, which help us to find hotspots and potential improvements of sustainability.

Why U.S. Consumers Buy Sustainable Cotton Made Collegiate Apparel? A Study of the Key Determinants

“…Sustainable practice is considered a practice that supports economic and profitable growth, while helping to minimize environmental impact [12,13]. Cotton, marketed as "The Fabric of Our Lives", is a prominent material used for home textiles and apparel, and has been commonly mentioned in debates on sustainability [14]. Compared to the conventional production processes of cotton fibers, Cotton Incorporated [15] indicated that by implementing innovative technologies and tracking system the cotton could be grown and produced in more sustainable ways that could reduce the water, energy and chemical footprint by at least 50%.…”

Carbon Emission Evaluation Based on Multi-Objective Balance of Sewing Assembly Line in Apparel Industry

“…However, some secondary data are more difficult to obtain, such as the carbon emission coefficients of different fabrics and the carbon emission coefficients of different accessories. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain data from the Ecoinvent database and other literature references [11][12][13]. The carbon emission coefficients of the sewing production related materials are shown in Table 3.…”

“…For a pair of trousers with a service life of about 2 years and 10% polyester in composition, the total carbon emissions of the production and consumption were about 47 kg, which was 117 times more than its own weight. In [13], it was found that the carbon emissions of the production process of apparel products could account for 70% of the total carbon emissions of the product. In [14], carbon emissions for cotton and wool fabric products were evaluated.…”

Cotton in the new millennium: advances, economics, perceptions and problems

“…The biggest issue in the wet-processing of cotton is the excessive wastage of water with little recycling in developing countries which is responsible for the contamination of surface water after discharging into streams whilst still containing high contents of toxic dyes and other chemicals [385]. In some developed countries water, after purification, is further diluted in order to lessen the concentration of different hazardous elements on discharge, a practice which requires further wastage of water.…”