2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2006.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lies, damned lies, and political campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
105
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such 'over pledging' is rational if parties place greater value on short-term electoral gains than on any potential long-term reputational damage that might be caused by breaking election promises. In their model of electoral competition, Callander and Wilkie (2007) find that candidates who lie about their policy intentions during an election campaign are at a competitive advantage. Moreover, it could be argued that pledges to cut taxes and expand programmes are exactly the sort of expansionary policies that are needed to boost the economy when it is weak according to Keynesian economic theory.…”
Section: How Economic Conditions Affect Pledge Fulfilmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such 'over pledging' is rational if parties place greater value on short-term electoral gains than on any potential long-term reputational damage that might be caused by breaking election promises. In their model of electoral competition, Callander and Wilkie (2007) find that candidates who lie about their policy intentions during an election campaign are at a competitive advantage. Moreover, it could be argued that pledges to cut taxes and expand programmes are exactly the sort of expansionary policies that are needed to boost the economy when it is weak according to Keynesian economic theory.…”
Section: How Economic Conditions Affect Pledge Fulfilmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banks (1990) analyzes Downsian competition where candidates may make false announcements about their preferred positions, but lying has an exogenous cost that increases in the distance between their preferred and announced positions. While Banks finds pooling of candidate types over an interval containing the median voter's most preferred position, Callander and Wilkie (2007) shows that if there is a cheap talking type in the model, pooling happens at two disjoint intervals on either side of the median voter's ideal point. Thus, the "best" types (those that are preferred most by the median voter) pool in the former paper while the "moderate" types pool in the latter, and all the other types separate.…”
Section: Continuous Type Spacementioning
confidence: 96%
“…But electoral disappointment can be introduced as a shift of voters distribution, correlated with the degree of electoral fulfillment. To make things simple as possible assume that median voter distribution is shifted to left in the case of an R incumbent, or to the right in the case of an L incumbent of a fix factor x > 0, if the elected officer deviates from the expected policy(ies) 10 . The reader can easily verify that the claim of Theorem 8 holds even if we impose electors' beliefs about the two candidates to be independent.…”
Section: From Equation 1 It Follows Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is strong 9 Which is allowed by our definition of equilibrium. 10 Excluding the case of a totally out of equilibrium policy, which defines the MD1 criterion.…”
Section: From Equation 1 It Follows Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation