License to Deny? Publisher restrictions on document delivery from e‐licensed journals

Wiley, Lynn

doi:10.1108/02641610410538559

Cited by 14 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2004, Lynn Wiley, from the University of Illinois UrbanaChampaign in Urbana, published an excellent discussion about interlibrary lending and e-journal licenses. 3 It was interesting to note that not all of the limitations on interlibrary library loan were because of the license agreement. Libraries responding to Wiley's survey indicated other reasons for not filling requests from electronic versions of journals, including difficulty accessing the license information easily and as a result, making decisions to fill requests only from print versions of journals even if the electronic version was available.…”

Section: The Interlibrary Loan Factormentioning

confidence: 99%

Conversion of an Academic Health Sciences Library to a Near-Total Electronic Library: Part 2

Lingle

Robinson

2009

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last ten years, many health sciences libraries have gradually converted their collections from predominantly print journal subscriptions to electronic-only subscriptions. This is being driven by budget, space issues, and user preference. The desire to retain both print and electronic versions of journal titles has proven to be unsustainable for many health sciences libraries in the face of flat or shrinking budgets and increased demand for space at the institutional level. Due to demand for space for a clinical simulation facility at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, the George T. Harrell Health Sciences Library was faced with the need to accelerate the shift to primarily an electronic collection when more than 80% of the print journals and more than 20% of the print book collection were removed from the library. Part one of this article discussed how a case had to be made to the college administration that the older literature was still utilized and had value-and that it would be worthwhile to selectively purchase the electronic ''backfiles'' or archival files to replace high-use print journals. This second part of the article provides a detailed discussion of the decisions that resulted from the data analysis, subsequent actions that were taken to remove the collection, why certain backfiles were selected for purchase, and resulting impacts on both library users and library staff workflow.

show abstract

Section: The Interlibrary Loan Factormentioning

confidence: 99%

Conversion of an Academic Health Sciences Library to a Near-Total Electronic Library: Part 2

Lingle

Robinson

2009

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gadd et al (2003); Antelman (2006); and Coleman (2007) have analysed license agreements regarding the issue of author selfarchiving. A study by Wiley (2004) on publisher restrictions on document delivery opined that library staff is being restricted by the publisher agreements. Coleman (2007) analysed the self-archiving and the copyright transfer agreements of 52 ISI-ranked library and information science journals.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

License Agreements-A Barrier to Interlibrary Loan?

Prakash¹,

Mishra²,

Sharma³

et al. 2018

Journ. of Informa. Managem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increase in scholarly electronic resources and the availability of technology to host the resources have created a situation where in the expectations of patrons have increased to a level where they expect everything they need is possible to have. Libraries are under tremendous strain to keep up with the expectations of their patrons with ever shrinking budgets. Whatever may be the size of the budget of a Library, there is always a segment of information requirement that cannot be fulfilled by the host Library. This segment of information required by their patrons is fulfilled through Inter-Library Loan (ILL)/Document Delivery Services (DDS). Hence, ILL/ DDS has always been a part of Library services right from the 'print only' days. With the advent of electronic age where the electronic resources are licensed rather than owned, ILL/DDS services have been very challenging with the restrictions imposed by the publishers. The clauses or conditions regarding ILL/DDS vary widely from publisher to publisher. The licensor sets out the terms for what can be used, by whom, how, for how long and at what cost. This work has examined license agreements of 43 publishers. The observations made may be useful for libraries to negotiate better terms and conditions so that an equitable solution is sought for both the libraries and the publishers.

show abstract

“…However, it is laborious to maintain and update the information required: the Okamoto study found that the checking tasks and lack of knowledge very often lead ILL librarians refusing to supply e-journal contents (Okamoto, 2012). Wiley notes succinctly that "the license checking that is required inhibits fulfilment more than the licenses restrictions do themselves" (Wiley, 2004).…”

Section: Identifying the Proper Licencementioning

confidence: 99%

To each his own: how to provide a library user with an article respecting licence agreements

Mangiaracina

Russo

Tugnoli

2015

Interlending &Amp; Document Supply

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -This paper aims to describe the state of the art of the Italian Archivio Licenze Periodici Elettronici (ALPE) project which aims to improve the understanding of the issues raised by licence agreements of electronic resources in the Inter-Library Loan Service and to support librarians in the implementation of the right policies. Design/methodology/approach -ALPE -(E-Journals Licenses Archive) is a national archive of interlibrary loan (ILL) clauses, extracted from standard and negotiated licences, to manage, to publicly share and to check the permitted uses of e-resources for ILL and document delivery. Findings -The ALPE archive facilitates public and free access to a remarkable amount of information and data about ILL conditions granted by the most important commercial and academic publishers, and responds to the practical problems of managing and understanding ILL clauses in e-licences. Originality/value -The solutions adopted by ALPE effectively solve many of the problems reported in the literature. These should help ILL librarians in dealing with the problems associated with ILL and licensing.

show abstract

License to Deny? Publisher restrictions on document delivery from e‐licensed journals

Cited by 14 publications

References 4 publications

Conversion of an Academic Health Sciences Library to a Near-Total Electronic Library: Part 2

Conversion of an Academic Health Sciences Library to a Near-Total Electronic Library: Part 2

License Agreements-A Barrier to Interlibrary Loan?

To each his own: how to provide a library user with an article respecting licence agreements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About