Library and information science research in the Arab World: a bibliometric analysis 1951–2021

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the research productivity of library and information science (LIS) authors affiliated with the 22 countries of the Arab League. It also identifies the top countries, organizations, authors, journals, natures of collaboration, and frequently used keywords in LIS research in the Arab world. Design/methodology/approach Bibliometric methods were used to evaluate the research performance of the authors affiliated with library organizations in the Arab region. The Elsevier Scopus database was selected for data retrieval. A comprehensive search strategy was adopted to retrieve 863 publications contributed by LIS authors affiliated with the Arab countries. VOS viewer, Biblioshiny, BiblioAnalyitics, Microsoft Access and Microsoft Excel were used for data visualization and analysis. Findings This paper presents the dynamics and the state of the LIS research in the Arab region published between 1951 and 2021. The results of the study have highlighted an upward trend in the growth of the publications, especially in the past four years. The largest number of studies were published in the year 2020. The country-wise analysis ranked Kuwait and Saudi Arabia as the top LIS research producing countries with five and four researchers, respectively. The Kuwait University, the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals and the Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University were the three most productive organizations. Academic libraries, social media, bibliometrics, information-seeking behavior, information literacy and knowledge management were identified as the major areas of interest for the researchers. Internet and open access were topics that had gained recent popularity, while the digital library, research data management, green librarianship, link data, cloud computing, library leadership, library automation and artificial intelligence were identified as areas requiring further attention. Furthermore, the single-author pattern was found to be the most preferred pattern. Practical implications The findings of this study would help prospective researchers in choosing the neglected areas of research that require further investigation. They would also help policymakers in identifying factors that need more attention and allocation of research funds. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first comprehensive bibliometric study that presents a holistic picture of the LIS research in the Arab region.

Tracking the research trends in the library and information science: a case study of India

“…Previous studies also support our findings that validate an increasing and positive trend in the field (Bhakta et al, 2019;Garg and Sharma, 2017;Khanchandani, 2019;Larivière, 2012;Li et al, 2019;Naseer and Mahmood, 2009;Pandita et al, 2021;Siddique et al, 2021aSiddique et al, , 2021bSun and Yuan, 2020;Wani et al, 2008).…”

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

“…There arises a need for the “collection, storage, retrieval and dissemination” of research outcomes. Hence, attention towards galleries, libraries, archives, and museums escalates because of their primary objective to “collect, store, retrieve and share” information (Siddique et al , 2021). Information professionals are the human resources that deal with the handling of information.…”

Measuring the global research landscape on nonviolence (Ahiṃsā) over three decades (1991–2021)

“…The h-index, also known as the say Hirsch index, integrates both quantity and visibility of publications in terms of single-number criterion. 46 Farrell's output has the highest h-index value (38), followed by Martin with an h-index of 19. Among the 10 most productive authors, six are from the United States, and one each from the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Slovenia.…”

“…The process of data selection, extraction, and filtration is depicted in Figure 1 and is based on a four-phase model of data selection, eligibility, screening, and finalization used successfully in recent bibliometric studies. 38,39,40,41 The protocol for this study was adapted to remove document type and language filters. In the first phase, identification, the initial Scopus comprehensive…”