2022
DOI: 10.1108/idd-10-2021-0115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the research output on “library and information science” (LIS) research domain in South Africa. It also highlights the top LIS research organisations, authors, journals, collaboration types and commonly used keywords. This research will aid in the identification of emerging concepts, trends and advances in this subject. Design/methodology/approach The Web of Science (WoS), an indexing and abstracting database, served as a tool for bibliographical data. By apply… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(143 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is noteworthy to mention that there is an author collaboration index of 4.9, authors per article 4.59 and co-authors per article 5.21 (Table 1). The results are in line with prior studies like Wani et al. (2022) and Liu et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, it is noteworthy to mention that there is an author collaboration index of 4.9, authors per article 4.59 and co-authors per article 5.21 (Table 1). The results are in line with prior studies like Wani et al. (2022) and Liu et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, it is noteworthy to mention that there is an author collaboration index of 4.9, authors per article 4.59 and co-authors per article 5.21 (Table 1). The results are in line with prior studies like Wani et al (2022) and Liu et al (2005). There has been significant interest in using co-authorship to assess scientific collaboration (Beaver, 2001;Aghakhani et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the contemporary world, bibliometric techniques have been widely used to highlight the research trends and progress in various branches of knowledge (Ülker et al , 2022; Wani et al , 2022). Accordingly, bibliometric techniques used in the present study provided new insights into the current status and development of emotion regulation research published worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%