2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liberation: Acceptable production of tropical forest timber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
56
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Liberation treat ments might include mechanical girdling and/or killing with herbicides of non-com mercial trees that overtop future crop trees, plus vine cutting to accelerate the recruit ment and growth of trees that have the capa city to grow to be large. Such treatments can accelerate average tree growth by 9-27% for all tree species, and by 50-60% for future crop trees (Peña-Claros et al 2008, Villegas et al 2009); application of such treatments to a selectively logged forest in Amazonian Brazil doubled the annual rate of aboveground biomass recovery from 0.16 to 0.33 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 (see SM for calculations) du ring at least the initial 6 years following log ging (Wadsworth & Zweede 2006). It is im portant to note, however, that in Indonesia, the benefits of RIL for the residual stand dis appeared where the logging intensity was > 8 trees ha -1 (Sist et al 2003).…”
Section: Restoring Slightly Degraded Forest (Sdf P0 To a To Pa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liberation treat ments might include mechanical girdling and/or killing with herbicides of non-com mercial trees that overtop future crop trees, plus vine cutting to accelerate the recruit ment and growth of trees that have the capa city to grow to be large. Such treatments can accelerate average tree growth by 9-27% for all tree species, and by 50-60% for future crop trees (Peña-Claros et al 2008, Villegas et al 2009); application of such treatments to a selectively logged forest in Amazonian Brazil doubled the annual rate of aboveground biomass recovery from 0.16 to 0.33 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 (see SM for calculations) du ring at least the initial 6 years following log ging (Wadsworth & Zweede 2006). It is im portant to note, however, that in Indonesia, the benefits of RIL for the residual stand dis appeared where the logging intensity was > 8 trees ha -1 (Sist et al 2003).…”
Section: Restoring Slightly Degraded Forest (Sdf P0 To a To Pa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the switch from excessively de structive to reduced-impact logging re portedly ranges from having slight negative (Tay et al 2002) to large positive effects on profits from timber harvesting (Holmes et al 2002). Depending on geographical location, season, and equipment, costs for liberation treatments by girdling of unwanted trees are likewise modest; in Bolivia they were estim ated at US$ 0.21-1.04 per tree or about US$ 5.08-25.17 ha -1 (Ohlson-Kiehn et al 2006; this assumes girdling of 24.2 competing trees ha -1 on average, based on Wadsworth & Zweede 2006). The costs of restoration using assisted natural regeneration techniques are far less than enrichment planting and other conventional plantation development tech niques because the costs of propagating, rai sing, and planting seedlings are avoided (Ganz & Durst 2003, Shono et al 2007a.…”
Section: Making These Strategies Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for a few dollars per hectare, the growth rates of trees that sequester large amounts of carbon and hold carbon for a long time can often be doubled by clearing vines and overtopping less enduring trees that compete with them (Wadsworth and Zweede 2006;Villegas et al 2009). Restoring more degraded stands, by assisting natural regeneration is low in cost and often results in substantial gains in terms of carbon and biodiversity (Dugan et al 2003).…”
Section: Develop Incentives To Enhance Carbon Stocks In Logged Burnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that were conducted in the tropical forests have revealed that silvicultural treatments performed after logging may significantly increase the growth rates (WADSWORTH; ZWEEDE, 2006;PEÑA-CLAROS et al, 2008;VILLEGAS et al, 2009). Silva (2001) affirms that the growth rate of individuals that received silvicultural treatments may double compared to the logged and not consequently treated forest areas, or even quadruplicate compared to the unlogged forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%