2011
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0556-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to classifying and restoring degraded tropical forests for the anticipated REDD+ climate change mitigation mechanism

Abstract: Inclusion of improved forest management as a way to enhance carbon sinks in the Copenhagen Accord of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (December 2009) suggests that forest restoration will play a role in global climate change mitigation under the post-Kyoto agreement. Although discussions about restoration strategies often pertain solely to severely degraded tropical forests and invoke only the enrichment planting option, different approaches to restoration are needed to counter the ful… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The program "Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries" (REDD+) aims at reducing the impact on climate change, conserving biology, and protecting ecosystem services by increasing carbon reductions [26]. However, one general method to measure carbon across the landscape does not yet exist and the aspect of forest degradation in this context has long been disregarded [26,27]. Remote sensing in combination with ground data has been identified as being one of the key methods to map and monitor forest dynamics [28], partially because historical trends (including deforestation, afforestation, forest degradation, and regeneration) can only be identified with space-based remote sensing time series due to the poor ground data availability in many developing countries [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program "Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries" (REDD+) aims at reducing the impact on climate change, conserving biology, and protecting ecosystem services by increasing carbon reductions [26]. However, one general method to measure carbon across the landscape does not yet exist and the aspect of forest degradation in this context has long been disregarded [26,27]. Remote sensing in combination with ground data has been identified as being one of the key methods to map and monitor forest dynamics [28], partially because historical trends (including deforestation, afforestation, forest degradation, and regeneration) can only be identified with space-based remote sensing time series due to the poor ground data availability in many developing countries [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important factors of biodiversity loss is deforestation and forest degradation (Sodhi et al 2004;Harris et al 2012). Although forest degradation has a broad definition, it is often associated with a reduction in forest biomass (Sasaki and Putz 2009;Sasaki et al 2011;Thompson et al 2013). The extensive deforestation and degradation of forests are a significant reason for the biodiversity loss and global warming (Thompson et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is evident that this protection cannot be granted to all the forest fragments of the region, while on the edges of NPs, such as Ankasa, economic problems are causing an increase in anthropogenic pressure (Damnyag et al 2013). In order to avoid further depletion of forest resources within and around protected areas, viable management solutions, such as the European Union FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) facility should be strengthened (RamcilovicSuominen et al 2010), as well as smart and cost-effective restoration approaches (Sasaki et al 2011).…”
Section: Degradation Impacts and Protection Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%