2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2012.00548.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liberalism and nationalism in Russia. Boris Chicherin as a modernist nationalist

Abstract: This article investigates the link between nationalism and liberalism in Russia by looking at the way the leading spokesman of early Russian liberalism, Boris Chicherin, combined liberal ideas with notions of nation‐building and the idea of the nation as a modernising phenomenon. The article argues that the young Chicherin, at least in the formative years of the 1850s, had an instrumental approach to liberalism. Liberalism served a specific purpose – to integrate the people and shape a community of active citi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in their view, political rights were a more distant goal in the liberal balance between liberty and stability. Despite Nikolay’s assertion that a central parliament ‘would only do harm’ at the time of the Great Reforms, it does not seem that he agreed that the Russian people were not ready for democracy (Rabow-Edling, 2012) but rather that his notion of representative institutions was not that of a centralised parliament. Prince Orlov’s views on constitutionalism are clarified in a letter to Grand Duke Nicholas on 16 February 1865, in which he revealed the preference for a wider representative order.…”
Section: ‘Order and Freedom’: Contextualising Prince Orlov’s Experien...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, in their view, political rights were a more distant goal in the liberal balance between liberty and stability. Despite Nikolay’s assertion that a central parliament ‘would only do harm’ at the time of the Great Reforms, it does not seem that he agreed that the Russian people were not ready for democracy (Rabow-Edling, 2012) but rather that his notion of representative institutions was not that of a centralised parliament. Prince Orlov’s views on constitutionalism are clarified in a letter to Grand Duke Nicholas on 16 February 1865, in which he revealed the preference for a wider representative order.…”
Section: ‘Order and Freedom’: Contextualising Prince Orlov’s Experien...mentioning
confidence: 97%