“…3a) showed that its optical bandgap ( E g ) was 4.22 eV, which is larger than those of many famous NLO chalcohalides and thiosilicates, such as Li[LiCs 2 Cl][Ga 3 S 6 ] (4.18 eV), 41 [CsBa 3 Cl 2 ][Ga 5 S 10 ] (3.96 eV), 39 K 2 Ba 3 Ge 3 S 9 Cl 2 (3.69 eV), 50 NaBa 4 Ge 3 S 10 Cl (3.49 eV), 51 SrLi 2 SiS 4 (3.94 eV), 43 Li 2 ZnSiS 4 (3.9 eV), 52 BaGa 2 SiS 6 (3.75 eV), 42 Li 2 In 2 SiS 6 (3.61 eV), 53 and Li 2 Mg 2 Si 2 S 6 (3.24 eV). 46 We also summarized the bandgaps of known chalcohalides (>3.0 eV) in Table S3 (ESI†), and the detailed survey showed that [Sr 4 Cl 2 ][Si 3 S 9 ] exhibited the widest E g among the known IR NLO chalcohalides, which indicated that [Sr 4 Cl 2 ][Si 3 S 9 ] could break through the “4.0 eV wall” for the energy bandgap and thus has a large possibility to eliminate the harmful two-photon absorption. The electronic structure of [Sr 4 Cl 2 ][Si 3 S 9 ] was also studied by first-principles calculation and its theoretical E g was 3.633 eV (Fig.…”