The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical access and naming time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
575
10
16

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 939 publications
(640 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
39
575
10
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, lexical access was presumably completed for high-frequency words while low-frequency words were still being processed. Results from behavioral and eye movement studies corroborate this hypothesis revealing longer reaction times (e.g., Forster & Chambers, 1973;Rubenstein et al, 1970) and fixation durations on low-frequency words (e.g., Inhoff & Rayner, 1986;Kliegl et al, 2004;Kliegl et al, 2006;Rayner & Duffy, 1986;Schilling et al, 1998). In supplementary Frequency and predictability effects in reading 16 analyses we tested whether the result was caused by words of different lengths rather than by frequency.…”
Section: P200mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, lexical access was presumably completed for high-frequency words while low-frequency words were still being processed. Results from behavioral and eye movement studies corroborate this hypothesis revealing longer reaction times (e.g., Forster & Chambers, 1973;Rubenstein et al, 1970) and fixation durations on low-frequency words (e.g., Inhoff & Rayner, 1986;Kliegl et al, 2004;Kliegl et al, 2006;Rayner & Duffy, 1986;Schilling et al, 1998). In supplementary Frequency and predictability effects in reading 16 analyses we tested whether the result was caused by words of different lengths rather than by frequency.…”
Section: P200mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Readers take longer to recognize low than high-frequency words (e.g., Forster & Chambers, 1973;Rubenstein, Garfield, & Millikan, 1970). Eye-movement research corroborated this finding, revealing longer fixations on low than on high-frequency words (e.g., Inhoff & Rayner, 1986;Kliegl, Grabner, Rolfs, & Engbert, 2004;Kliegl, Nuthmann, & Engbert, 2006;Rayner & Duffy, 1986;Schilling, Rayner, & Chumbley, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…First, it might be interpreted as an effect of frequency of occurrence of the forms with Low, Medium, and High Reduction. Higher frequency words are recognized faster (Rubenstein et al, 1970;Forster & Chambers, 1973). It might be the case that word forms with a High Degree of Reduction occur less frequently than forms with less reduction and that this is the reason that the Highly Reduced forms are recognized less accurately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of word frequency are taken as an upper limit for lexical access (e.g., Forster and Chambers, 1973;Rubenstein et al, 1970;Sereno et al, 1998;Hauk and Pulvermüller, 2004, but see Balota and Chumbley, 1984 for a different view). Lexical access involves the matching of features extracted from the stimulus to internal representations of words.…”
Section: Early Phonological Activation In Visual Word Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%