2021
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202003916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lewis Acidic Boranes, Lewis Bases, and Equilibrium Constants: A Reliable Scaffold for a Quantitative Lewis Acidity/Basicity Scale

Abstract: Aq uantitative Lewis acidity/basicitys cale toward boron-centeredL ewis acids has been developed based on a set of 90 experimental equilibrium constantsf or the reactions of triarylboranes with various ON N-, Sand nd P-centered Lewis bases in dichloromethane at 20 8C. Analysis with the linear free energy relationship log K B = LA B + LB B allowse quilibrium constants, K B ,t ob ec alculated fora ny type of borane/Lewisb ase combination through the sum of two descriptors, one for Lewisa cidity (LA B)a nd one fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Final single point energies were calculated at the RI‐DSD‐PBEP86‐D3(BJ)/(ma‐)def2‐QZVPP, COSMO‐RS(CH 2 Cl 2 ) level and were combined with the thermal corrections from PBEh‐3c. The reliability of our computed Δ G solv values for TEPO binding were supported by good accordance with experimental values (e.g., for B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 , Δ G solv exp −55 kJ mol −1 vs. Δ G solv comp −67 kJ mol −1 ) [10] . Further, the 31 P NMR chemical shifts of the adducts were computed by hybrid density functional theory, where relativistic effects were approximated by the 2‐component spin–orbit ZORA approach (Δ δ 31normalP comp , PBE0/SO‐ZORA‐TZ2P) [34]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Final single point energies were calculated at the RI‐DSD‐PBEP86‐D3(BJ)/(ma‐)def2‐QZVPP, COSMO‐RS(CH 2 Cl 2 ) level and were combined with the thermal corrections from PBEh‐3c. The reliability of our computed Δ G solv values for TEPO binding were supported by good accordance with experimental values (e.g., for B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 , Δ G solv exp −55 kJ mol −1 vs. Δ G solv comp −67 kJ mol −1 ) [10] . Further, the 31 P NMR chemical shifts of the adducts were computed by hybrid density functional theory, where relativistic effects were approximated by the 2‐component spin–orbit ZORA approach (Δ δ 31normalP comp , PBE0/SO‐ZORA‐TZ2P) [34]…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, the hydride ion affinity (HIA) [9] has been suggested as the defining value for soft Lewis superacids [5] . gLA can also be determined by experimental techniques, such as solution phase studies of association equilibria, [10] or tensimetric methods [11] Effective Lewis acidity (eLA) corresponds to induced changes of physicochemical properties of a probe Lewis base upon binding of the Lewis acid (Figure 1 b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the need of data for the Lewis basicity of molecules not experimentally characterized, 27 several attempts were recently made for the estimation of either SbCl5 or BF3 enthalpies of adduct formation by quantum chemistry methods, see for example 22,28,29,30 We also contributed to the evaluation of high-level theoretical methods for calculating the enthalpies for reactions (1) and (2). 31 There are also data corresponding to BF3 enthalpies experimentally determined in the gas phase:…”
Section: Bf3(gas) + Lb(nb) → [Lb-bf3](nb) (2b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the need for data on the Lewis basicity of molecules not experimentally characterized [27], several attempts were recently made to estimate either SbCl 5 or BF 3 enthalpies of adduct formation by quantum chemistry methods; see, for example, [22,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%