Levers for Language Growth: Characteristics and Predictors of Language Trajectories between 4 and 7 Years

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence is required as to when and where to focus resources to achieve the greatest gains for children’s language development. Key to these decisions is the understanding of individual differences in children’s language trajectories and the predictors of those differences. To determine optimal timing we must understand if and when children’s relative language abilities become fixed. To determine where to focus effort we must identify mutable factors, that is those with the potential to be changed through interventions, which are associated with significant differences in children’s language scores and rate of progress.MethodsUniquely this study examined individual differences in language growth trajectories in a population sample of children between 4 and 7 years using the multilevel model for change. The influence of predictors, grouped with respect to their mutability and their proximity to the child (least-mutable, mutable-distal, mutable-proximal), were estimated.ResultsA significant degree of variability in rate of progress between 4 and 7 years was evident, much of which was systematically associated with mutable-proximal factors, that is, those factors with evidence that they are modifiable through interventions with the child or family, such as shared book reading, TV viewing and number of books in the home. Mutable-distal factors, such as family income, family literacy and neighbourhood disadvantage, hypothesised to be modifiable through social policy, were important predictors of language abilities at 4 years.ConclusionsPotential levers for language interventions lie in the child’s home learning environment from birth to age 4. However, the role of a family’s material and cultural capital must not be ignored, nor should the potential for growth into the school years. Early Years services should acknowledge the effects of multiple, cascading and cumulative risks and seek to promote child language development through the aggregation of marginal gains in the pre-school years and beyond.

Working memory mediates the effects of gestational age at birth on expressive language development in children.

“…Several significant direct effects emerged that were in line with the premises of the mediation model and corroborated our hypotheses. Regarding the environmental factors, our data showed that SES and HLE are directly associated with language, replicating previous findings (Farah et al, 2006;Hackman & Farah, 2009;Hart & Risley, 1992;Hoff & Tian, 2005;McKean et al, 2015;Noble et al, 2007;Roberts et al, 2005;Sénéchal & LeFevre, 2014;Wood, 2002). Moreover, consistently with the literature across kindergartners, first graders, and preadolescents (Evans & Schamberg, 2009;Farah et al, 2006;Hackman et al, 2014;Sarsour et al, 2011;Waber et al, 2007), disadvantaged SES was related to impaired temporary memory.…”

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognosis of language outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder

“…Furthermore, we used reference norms for comparison and did not require studies to include typically developing children. It is known that some variability in scores over time is not unique to ASD (Conti-Ramsden, St Clair, Pickles, & Durkin, 2012;McKean et al, 2015;Ukoumunne et al, 2012) so ideally studies would include other groups of children so language development in ASD can be placed within a developmental context.…”

Modeling the Nature of Grammar and Vocabulary Trajectories From Prekindergarten to Third Grade

“…However, it is unclear whether acceleration describes language trajectories only among the very young, or whether this pattern lasts into adolescence or even adulthood. To the latter point, others have asserted that linguistic growth will naturally plateau when children's skills achieve maturation, suggesting that linguistic trajectories will eventually decelerate to a point of plateau (McKean et al, 2015). To date, understanding of the shape of grammar and vocabulary trajectories is largely piecemeal, given a lack of longitudinal research that transcends the early childhood period and includes measures of both vocabulary and grammar development.…”