2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13753-021-00383-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Hazard, Exposure, and Social Vulnerability Data to Assess Flood Risk to Indigenous Communities in Canada

Abstract: This study integrates novel data on 100-year flood hazard extents, exposure of residential properties, and place-based social vulnerability to comprehensively assess and compare flood risk between Indigenous communities living on 985 reserve lands and other Canadian communities across 3701 census subdivisions. National-scale exposure of residential properties to fluvial, pluvial, and coastal flooding was estimated at the 100-year return period. A social vulnerability index (SVI) was developed and included 49 v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After normalizing CRIs, we compared the simulated severity of disasters with actual severity, and found they were generally consistent. As shown in Figure 2, the accuracy of CRI and actual grade of rainstorm and flood process with disaster serial numbers of 5,7,9,11,14,16,18,19,20,22,28,30, and 32 are significant, while the accuracy of 6, 8, 10, 12, 23, 24, 27, and 31 are not significant. Therefore, the CRI system based on FCE is proved to be able to estimate risks for a disaster process.…”
Section: Cri Calculation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After normalizing CRIs, we compared the simulated severity of disasters with actual severity, and found they were generally consistent. As shown in Figure 2, the accuracy of CRI and actual grade of rainstorm and flood process with disaster serial numbers of 5,7,9,11,14,16,18,19,20,22,28,30, and 32 are significant, while the accuracy of 6, 8, 10, 12, 23, 24, 27, and 31 are not significant. Therefore, the CRI system based on FCE is proved to be able to estimate risks for a disaster process.…”
Section: Cri Calculation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous studies applied tools of cloud models [16], weighted comprehensive evaluation [17], GIS spatial analysis [18][19][20][21][22], prediction of future precipitation patterns [23], and statistical models [24,25]. There is no linear relationship among these studies due to different indicators and scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach is to use social vulnerability indices, which combine spatial data with socioeconomic and demographic factors that predict a community's relative vulnerability to natural hazards [10,[24][25][26][27]. Collated indices have been used to identify communities most in need of assistance during hurricanes [28], floods [29], wildfires [30], and heatwaves [31], but their application to longerterm stressors such as water scarcity has been limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many historical and present-day factors contribute to the vulnerability of traditional Indigenous modes of livelihood, including social inequality, poverty, cultural assimilation, sovereignty issues, land appropriation, and the overexploitation of resources by external agents [ 1 ]. However, the inextricable link between IPs and nature makes TFS particularly exposed to climate change and environmental impacts [ 4 , 6 ], which interact with other existing drivers to exacerbate vulnerability by increasing susceptibility to harm and hindering the capacity to cope and adapt [ 10 ]. Climate change can directly disrupt TFS by hindering Indigenous subsistence practices and access to food resources through alterations in the physical environment, and by altering the availability of food species through impacts on their distribution, abundance, and phenology [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%